Skip to main content

View Diary: Linda Greenhouse has a fascinating piece re ACA (18 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  and she missed the point here (0+ / 0-)
    The objection, then, has to be not to the mandate’s actual impact but to its expressive nature, its implicit endorsement of a value system that says it’s perfectly O.K. to have sex without the goal of making a baby.
    It is not the endorsement of sex that is objected too. The money isn't seen as a material cooperation in that. It is the contributing to the ending of a human life (a life in the eyes of some).
    •  that's not the legal argument being made (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      doroma

      on this Greenhouse is correct.

      "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

      by teacherken on Thu Nov 28, 2013 at 05:06:56 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site