Skip to main content

View Diary: Measuring Fukushima Radioactivity in the Ocean: Why does it take so long? (78 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You are arguing deceptively (0+ / 0-)

    If you claim multiple people are 'misunderstanding' what you are saying, then perhaps the fault doesn't lie with your readers.

    We are discussing release and dispersal of radionuclides from Fukushima, and you state in this discussion that there is evidence of health effects on seals/sea lions.

    When asked for evidence to support this claim, you link to a study that explicitly says that relevance to biota health is limited, and has no relevance to Fukushima.

    Then, when challenged, you repeat your claim and, once again, provide no evidence to back yourself up.

    That said, I have looked into previous 'events' regarding unusual die-offs of seals/sea lions along the western coast:

    The cause of the present 2013 UME is not yet determined, but here's some info about previous UMEs:

    Q: How many sea lion Unusual Mortality Events have previously occurred in California?

    A: This is the sixth UME involving California sea lions that has occurred in California. Prior UMEs were declared in 1991, 1992, 1998, 2000 and 2002. Previous UMEs were caused by leptospirosis (1991), El Niño conditions (1992) and domoic acid toxicity (1998, 2000, 2002). To date, 57 UMEs have been formally declared in U.S. waters since 1991 (including the current UME).

    Now, it's pretty clear that humans aren't responsible for the El Nino UME, do you have evidence that we caused any or all of the others?

    Some more info on leptospirosis:

    and domioc acid toxicity:

    with plenty of references (academic work, no less).

    Your accusation of 'sales-man' is pretty ironic considering you rely on hand-waving and 'facts' that break down under the harsh light of research.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site