Skip to main content

View Diary: 20 Years Ago, She Lost Her House Seat Because She Wanted To Cut Social Security. Still Didn't Learn (20 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I like that Clinton thing you did there. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Rogneid

    It won't accomplish anything, but you show as much grit as Margolies is showing in the pursuit of a weird agenda.

    It's not the side effects of the cocaine/I'm thinking that it must be love

    by Rich in PA on Mon Dec 09, 2013 at 10:00:02 AM PST

    •  Yeah, because the Clintons (0+ / 0-)

      are beacons of progressive populism.

      •  It's amazing that after 6 years of President... (0+ / 0-)

        ...Obama you think it's more correct to identify flexibility about Social Security with the Clintons.

        It's not the side effects of the cocaine/I'm thinking that it must be love

        by Rich in PA on Mon Dec 09, 2013 at 10:13:39 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  No, I'm trying to make a point that (0+ / 0-)

          Margolies is running for this seat because her son married into American royalty.  She's a Clinton - in - law who has access to a large donor base and thinks that she can get back into the House on that sole reason.

          The Obama Admin has been horrible when pushing for Chained CPI and have gotten their asses kicked by progressives like Warren on the issue.  That's the only reason why Chained CPI is off the table.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site