Skip to main content

View Diary: I have been a gun owner for more than 30 years…and 365 days (183 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I think you just proved the point above, didn't (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    coquiero, samanthab

    you?

    There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

    by oldpotsmuggler on Sat Dec 14, 2013 at 02:14:37 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Not at all. (0+ / 0-)

      One shot kills are still the ethic and the goal, but that doesn't mean that proceeding shots aren't still occasionally needed.
      Further, particularly with bird hunting there can be more than one.

      Do you think that the existence of double-barrel shotguns preclude a one-shot ethic?

      Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.

      by FrankRose on Sat Dec 14, 2013 at 02:30:52 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Do you think that there are no differences between (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        coquiero

        hunting waterfowl (or, for instance, quail), and big game?

        There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

        by oldpotsmuggler on Sat Dec 14, 2013 at 03:15:31 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site