Skip to main content

View Diary: Good for Some, Bad for All – The High Cost of Our Cell Phone Bills (9 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Jeff - not exactly (0+ / 0-)

    Corporations CANNOT fund PACs. All PAC contributions come from individuals, not from the corporate treasury. They are not corporate funds.

    When you contribute to a political campaign you have to disclose your employer. When groups report campaign contributions and aggregate the data they lump all employee contributions together and try to make the inference that these are somehow funded by the corporations themselves. I wish that groups like OpenSecrets would make it very clear that these are individual contributions, either directly or through PACs, and NOT corporate contributions. Rather than being truthful in their press releases, they intentionally give the impression that the campaign contributions are corporate contributions and that theme is then carried on by the media and in Internet blogs.

    When we have House campaigns that can cost up to $10 million to compete, and Senate seats that can cost two or three times that amount, how much influence does $10,000 really buy?

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Thu Dec 19, 2013 at 09:17:18 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Corporations can easily fund politcians indirectly (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VClib

      Dear VClib,

      What I am talking about are "separate segregated funds" (SSFs)- the McDonald's PAC, the Goldman PAC, etc. They are funds collected from the management of these corporations and then delivered to politicians (ever wonder why CEO pay is so much higher than worker salaries?). These managers can just get paid higher and higher compensation to easily cover this expense. The corporations also fund the administrative expenses which can be considerable. Citizens United made it worse - and I am advocating that we overturn that decision by constitutional amendment. See this FEC Brochure. I also support passing a law that would allow for public financing of elections - the best ideas should flow to the top, not the ones with the most access to money - we know this works in NYC to get a less corrupt government and it should be implemented nationally. You are right that elections are expensive, but I believe the status quo needs to change if we are to do things like properly regulate banks, raise the minimum wage, close the carried interest and other tax loopholes for the wealthiest, invest more in education and less on defense, etc. The conflict of interest created by SSFs giving to politicians is real. Thanks again for sharing. Jeff p.s. $10,000 buys a lot of influence - money can translate to power. Will you make a $2,600 contribution to my campaign?
      p.p.s. Have you seen this video?

      •  As someone who knows more about senior (0+ / 0-)

        executive compensation at public companies than all but a few of the people registered here I can assure you that am unaware of any executive compensation that has been increased so the executives can make larger PAC contributions.

        "let's talk about that"

        by VClib on Thu Dec 19, 2013 at 10:08:33 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site