Skip to main content

View Diary: Lengthy Analysis of Bush's 6/28/05 Speech (77 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Way to go (none)
    This was an excellent article and all you can say is it was to long?  Well then, let me make this brief: Fuck You.

    I'm a hustler, baby. I'm a shining star!
    www.buttermyself.com

    by buttermyself on Wed Jun 29, 2005 at 09:10:28 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Harsh, but (none)
      I more or less agree.  No one said you have to read it.  

      Our side is more thoughtful and intellectual.  That's a strength, not a weakness.  

      The Republican Party: Redefining Oppression for the 21st Century

      by daveriegel on Wed Jun 29, 2005 at 10:31:59 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Like I said (none)
        I asked what is the diarists intended audience? I am no one to talk given the speed with which I write my posts, but if I want to do something beyond a simple chat,  I think about how I am writing because form counts as much as what I am writing. Again, let me repeat, it depends on what this person wants to do with this because I sensed in their own statements a desire to reach a wider audience than D Kos. If his/her purpose is to analyze the situation for just D Kos, then it's fine the way it is. If not, then succint writing would be the preferred choice. That's my point in a nutshell. So, what exactly is the problem with this position?
    •  As I said - who is this for? (none)
      If it is for yourself- fine- but if you are wanting to convince others then yes form matters as much as substance.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site