Skip to main content

View Diary: Supreme Court puts Utah marriage equality on hold for now (363 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I think that's right. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Darmok, VClib

    This is a difference.  If this judge was wrong and the Utah Constitutional provision is not invalid under the U.S. Constitution, then that means that they were contrary to the Utah Constitution when performed.  

    If the district court is affirmed, it's not an issue.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site