Skip to main content

View Diary: Hoboken: Why only three blocks were to be destroyed. (55 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I think what the Mayor and the Plan board (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kishik, jayden

    objected to was that the validating study left out some nine acres that the city considered as also qualified for redevelopment and only identified the three blocks that happened to belong to the Rockefeller Group.
    You'd think that group has enough money to spring for infra-structure improvements itself. Perhaps this was a notion that Samson came up with on his own.
    From where I sit, Samson is much hype and lots of connections. But, anyone whose resume goes on and on over a 13 month tenure as Attorney General out of a career of 55 years has a questionable attitude, IMHO. And, as far as I can tell, there is no Wolff to go with the Samson. He's got a very mediocre educational background and owes his current job to Christie.

    Obamacare at your fingertips: 1-800-318-2596; TTY: 1-855-889-4325

    by hannah on Sun Jan 19, 2014 at 10:31:21 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  of course realty wise... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      hannah, jayden

      if only those three were eligible for redevelopment, not sure what would be left for the other 6 (of the 9 block area) - put on hold?  Of course if simply rehabilitation, they wouldn't get other financing abilities.  Thus leaving the three "redeveloped" blocks even at greater worth.

      All the suffering of this world arises from a wrong attitude.The world is neither good or bad. It is only the relation to our ego that makes it seem the one or the other - Lama Anagorika Govinda

      by kishik on Sun Jan 19, 2014 at 10:58:13 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site