Skip to main content

View Diary: To those who want an armed society. (277 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Dismissing my legitimate question and then (5+ / 0-)

    personally attacking me is your idea of "honest discussion"?

    It was a righ-wing Supreme Court that decided LEO have no duty to protect!  HOW it magically becomes a RWNJ bs is a bit of a mystery.

    I know this, if I call the police, they do not have to respond, ever!  Hell, they don't even have to follow State Law that prompted the case listed above!

    If the police are on scene, as they were in the NYC case, THEY HAVE NO DUTY TO PROTECT!  And they stated as such.

    Answer the question, if you dare!

    Since you have no constitutional duty to protect anyone, EVEN WHEN State law demands it, why the hell do you need a damn gun?

    For personal protection, not to protect the public!

    This is the reality every American needs to understand! I know I me all the names you like, it doesn't change the fact we pay billions for "alleged police protection" but that's not in their actual job description!

    It pisses me off to no end, I've never owned a firearm, falsely believing the police were there to protect me, when in reality they are only their to protect themselves.

    Then you anti-rights activists won't allow anyone but yourselves the opportunity to defend themselves with the same weapons you have!

    It's absolute insanity!  (And be clear here, your policy position, not you personally)

    -7.62; -5.95 The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.~Tesla

    by gerrilea on Tue Feb 04, 2014 at 03:02:02 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site