Skip to main content

View Diary: Reince Priebus on Hillary Clinton: 'Everything's on the table' (281 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I think she is more liberal than that.... (7+ / 0-)

    she actually cares about women and children.  And women and children from around the world.  I think Obama cares too, but not with the long and very well qualified history of Hillary Clinton.

    You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad. Aldous Huxley

    by murrayewv on Mon Feb 10, 2014 at 01:45:45 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  If she cares about women (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      dicentra, antirove

      why is her old pal Ed Rendell making it his mission to destroy Social Security?  

      I'm terrified that she's going to try to do a Grand Bargain and I don't see her cutting defense so I wonder just how she's going to help women?  

      Women are the caregivers.  They care for the wounded and they are for their own kids and for the elderly and when they become elderly there isn't always someone to care for them.  

      Where is Hillary on entitlements?  If she's with Rendell and Simpson and Bowles and Warner etc. she is NOT with women.  

      •  Wha??? (7+ / 0-)

        You are blaming her for what Ed Rendell is doing?  

        It's the Supreme Court, stupid!

        by Radiowalla on Mon Feb 10, 2014 at 02:14:53 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  He's been a Clinton surrogate in the past (0+ / 0-)

          He's a huge Hillary fan.  If she is opposed to Social Security cuts why is he selling them?  I don't know where she is on the issue.  But I need to know because entitlement reform is going to continue to come up and I have no idea where she is on that now.  I can only watch the people who are usually in her corner and that doesn't reassure me at all.

          •  You are blaming her for things you don't like (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            atana, vcmvo2

            about him and that is outrageous.   They aren't the same person.  

            Oh, and here a just a few of the Democrats who have already endorsed her for the nomination.  I don't think you can find one enemy of Social Security among them.  By conflating her with Ed Rendell, you are only trying to serve your own already settled position.  

            Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.),Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas),John Lewis (Ga.), Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.),Alcee Hastings (Fla.),Jan Schakowsky (Ill.),Elizabeth Warren (Mass.),Barbara Mikulski (Md.),Barbara Boxer (Calif.),Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.)
            http://thehill.com/...

            It's the Supreme Court, stupid!

            by Radiowalla on Mon Feb 10, 2014 at 03:16:35 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

          •  then (0+ / 0-)

            I assume that she is on the wrong side.

            I do this because campaign promises in the heat of the primary cannot be relied upon, to determine what she will fight for.

            She has already defined herself by her record

            you wait until the fight is over, one guy is left standing. And that's how you know who won.

            by GideonAB on Mon Feb 10, 2014 at 03:23:06 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

      •  What? (0+ / 0-)

        And if true -- doubtful and ineffective from a retired has-been like Ed Rendell -- who gives a shit about her 'friends'?

        Also I thought Obama rammed chained CPI down our throats already, the Wall Street bastard!

        Oh wait -- that never happened and never will.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site