Skip to main content

View Diary: Watch heckler inside Supreme Court shout money is not speech (237 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Constitutional amendment isn't necessary (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Shockwave

    Its a red herring argument. There are easier ways to accomplish the same thing if Congress feels enough pressure. IMO the resistance to overturn Citizens United is largely a bipartisan problem. See Musials comments above.

    Money is property, not speech. Overturn Citizens United.

    by Betty Pinson on Fri Feb 28, 2014 at 08:59:39 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  A Red Herring to you (0+ / 0-)

      But the consensus of members of Congress and legal scholars is that it would take a Constitutional Amendment or new Justices on the court and a new case.

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Fri Feb 28, 2014 at 11:36:24 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site