Skip to main content

View Diary: Economists: Paul Ryan misrepresents us in his poverty report (61 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Only if you understand the field and know WTF you (0+ / 0-)

    are talking about.  Ryan fails at both, so the other conclusion is what Joan wrote: the guy is lying.  Heck, dinotrac, Ryan is coming UP only in the sense that he is not plagiarizing by quoting without attribution.  There are several diaries just on DK about it.  Why would you give Ryan the benefit of the doubt without reading his stuff or the studies?

    •  It helps. (0+ / 0-)

      Certainly if you actually want to use the data to find a different result instead of simply saying that the methodology is wrong/inadequate, etc.

      Doesn't take a genius, for example, to see that a 95% confidence interval on a hundred variables is almost certain to produce something wrong somewhere.

      LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

      by dinotrac on Tue Mar 04, 2014 at 02:19:19 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Oh really? (0+ / 0-)

      It could also be that Ryan is fully correct, and Dr. Brown's feedback was misrepresented by The Fiscal Times.


      Speaking of “misrepresentation,” I take issue with your portrayal of my email communication to you as suggesting that Congressman Ryan incorrectly cited my work with Amy Finkelstein of MIT. You provided me the quote from his report and asked me if it was accurate, noting that another academic suggested it may not be. My exact response to you was: “That quote is an accurate representation of our work. My only caveat would be that although Medicaid has this effect, there may also be other factors that would continue to limit the size of the private market even if Medicaid was reformed.” The caveat was provided to help you – as the reporter – to understand the context for the citation in case you wanted to explore the policy implications of our work further and to help you understand why another academic might have felt the quote was inaccurate. But I did not suggest nor do I hold the view that Congressman Ryan “ignored” the caveat, as implied by your writing. Nor, as implied by the title of your piece, do I believe Congressman Ryan “misrepresented” my research. His citation was appropriate. Obviously, the interactions of Medicaid and long-term care are complex, and a full discussion would go far beyond the small summary they provided. But that is true of any summary - indeed, even our own abstract of the paper does not provide that caveat due to word count constraints. In short, I do NOT believe that my work was misrepresented in the Ryan document. Rather, I believe my email was misrepresented in your article."

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site