Skip to main content

View Diary: Since 1938, Only Three Presidents Have Never Signed a Minimum Wage Increase (50 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  False. (0+ / 0-)

    There's no data to suggest that. That's your opinion, and it isn't backed up by any polling data.


    ODS results in Obama's amazing ability to humiliate his biggest critics, on the right and the left.

    by NoFortunateSon on Fri Mar 07, 2014 at 08:53:37 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  LOL! Nobody said it was anything else, (0+ / 0-)

      did they? Meanwhile, Social Security Cuts Available for Placement on The Next Budget Table just happened earlier this week. It's a little too soon for poll numbers to reflect that bullshit.

      Don't be such an Eager Worker Bee, there, NFS. Thanks to stuff like that, we all have our mid-terms work cut out for us. Way to go...

      This all started with "what the Republicans did to language".

      by lunachickie on Fri Mar 07, 2014 at 09:00:24 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Ah, the magical mythical SS cuts that never happen (0+ / 0-)

        There no polling to suggest that when they were supposedly on the table, it never hurt Democrats. So basically, you're just projecting your wishful thinking, or full of it. Take your pick.


        ODS results in Obama's amazing ability to humiliate his biggest critics, on the right and the left.

        by NoFortunateSon on Fri Mar 07, 2014 at 09:16:56 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Yawn (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          flowerfarmer

          yawn, yawn. you guys and your "but it didn't happen!" bullshit. Seriously, y'all need to bury that idiotic trope. It just makes the Party you claim to love so much look tone-deaf and cold-blooded.

          Maybe that's the whole idea or something--who knows, anymore?

          This all started with "what the Republicans did to language".

          by lunachickie on Fri Mar 07, 2014 at 12:10:25 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

    •  According to his WH spokesman (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      lunachickie, flowerfarmer

      SS cuts may not be in the budget, but they're still on the table.  Take it up with the WH.

      Money is property, not speech. Overturn Citizens United.

      by Betty Pinson on Fri Mar 07, 2014 at 09:00:41 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I don't think that's what he meant (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        flowerfarmer

        for once ;)

        But I could be wrong. But yes, in the next Fiscal Budget Year, SS cuts are still "on the table". Why the fuck did that need to be reiterated before the midterms?

        You'd think the man doesn't want a Democratic majority in both the House and the Senate.

        This all started with "what the Republicans did to language".

        by lunachickie on Fri Mar 07, 2014 at 09:04:17 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site