Skip to main content

View Diary: Maryland and Minnesota Democrats Undercut the National Party on the Minimum Wage (67 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  So a Democrat has to be as progressive (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    AlexDrew

    as the most progressive people here?  

    Do you really think that all elected officials with a "D" behind their name must toe the party line on everything?  

    Some Democrats may well see the need for an increase in the minimum wage but also see the need -- for example -- to protect small businesses, and to allow companies to hire teenagers at a slightly lower cost for summer jobs, for example (the 85% for six months or less).  Does that make them traitors?  Does that mean you want to kick them out of the party?  

    Just like Republicans have different factions and there needs to be some negotiation among the party if they are to get anything passed with a "Republican majority" (see, e.g., the House) Democrats also have different factions and need to negotiate within their party to get things passed even when they have a majority of people in a body with a "D" behind their name.  

    •  No, a Democrat has to actually give a fuck (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      unfangus, Odysseus, Tonedevil

      whether their waitress can afford to eat and buy her kid school supplies.

      A Democrat has to be smart enough to understand that even if they come from a soft middle-class upbringing and have never known want, many a teen is actually supporting themselves or helping to support their family on that minimum wage job.

      It's not Richie Cunningham at dad's store for prom money, most of the time.

      There is no part of letting people who have no idea what it is to live on minimum wage opine about what those damn poor people should be settling for that has any place in a working peoples party, and this party has no hope of ever taking Congress again except as a party that serves poor and working people first.

      Everyone should read the response to the hiddens once a day. They'll find the same trolls jumping on corpses and squealing with glee over and over.

      by JesseCW on Tue Apr 08, 2014 at 08:02:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Wow. So this is not a step forward for people who (0+ / 0-)

        support a minimum wage increase to $10.10?  

        If someone gives you MOST, but not all, of what you want, is not worth anything?  

        If they support a bill that's most of what you want, but not 100% everything you want, you call them out as HURTING things rather than supporting a step forward giving you most of what you want?  

        Seriously?  

        •  This isn't even close, let alone "most", and (4+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          unfangus, Odysseus, AlexDrew, Tonedevil

          it's not about wants, it's about needs.

          You're effectively a straight person insisting gay people should thrilled with limited civil unions.

          It's not your place.  But inside the pervasive bubble of economic privilege that shapes all discussion here, I don't expect to have much company in calling you out on it.

          Everyone should read the response to the hiddens once a day. They'll find the same trolls jumping on corpses and squealing with glee over and over.

          by JesseCW on Tue Apr 08, 2014 at 08:14:20 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  Cost of living varies by a factor of 2.5 within US (0+ / 0-)

          For example, Dothan, AL to Manhattan.  That an official figure that is is probably understated.  

          There is much room for local minimum wage rates higher than the national rate.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site