Skip to main content

View Diary: Brendan Eich and Tolerance (162 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Nevertheless, your position is that there is some (0+ / 0-)

    level of corporate employment at which a person can be denied employment because of speech. Or, in this case, a small campaign contribution.  (and yes, $1000 is a small contribution to someone like Eich.)
       Keep in mind, the contribution was in support of a cause that was backed by major religions and was supported by the majority of voters in California and by voters in other states that had similar measures on the ballot.
       How much easier would it be to get LGBT folks or progressives in general fired from their jobs?
       If you think the campaign against Eich was okay, you don't have a leg to stand on when you protest the firing of others for their religious, moral, or political beliefs.

    •  First of all: (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Rebecca, Tonedevil

      It's not any more acceptable to advocate for homophobia than it is/was to advocate for segregation, no matter how "nicely" you try to frame it. And it doesn't matter if a majority of people supported it. Creating equal opportunity for all is not a popularity contest.

      Secondly of all, most of us vote in the privacy of the voting booth, which means that you're talking about a situation that simply isn't going to happen. It's when you go public with your support of homophobia and you're in the position to hire or fire people that it becomes an issue, just like it would be for being a skinhead or posting a Nazi symbol on your Facebook profile. And even if Eich kept his politics out of the workplace, there is still the perception of conflict of interest. I know that's not fair, I know that wasn't the way it was in the past, but that's a fact of life.

      And there is no equivalence to LGBT folks getting fired from their jobs to what Eich did. Being gay is biological which what Eich did was behavioral. Big difference.

      "The cost of liberty is less than the price of repression." - W.E.B. Du Bois Be informed. Fight the Police State.

      by Eternal Hope on Sun Apr 13, 2014 at 09:53:56 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  WOW (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Tonedevil

      This certainly sounds familiar:

      Keep in mind, the contribution was in support of a cause that was backed by major religions and was supported by the majority of voters in California and by voters in other states that had similar measures on the ballot.
      Again, if this was about an open white supremacist, we would Not. Be. Having. This. Conversation. Period.

      I'll ask you again...with whom is your beef? The market itself? The customers who boycotted Mozilla? OK Cupid? Surely it's not with the LGBT movement, because No. LGBT. Organization. Backed. Eich's. Removal.

      Oh, and also:

      If you think the campaign against Eich was okay, you don't have a leg to stand on when you protest the firing of others for their religious, moral, or political beliefs.
      Just watch. Welcome to the 21st century. I doubt Eich was the last anti-gay bigot to go down in flames. Get used to it. In the meantime, enjoy your false equivalence.

      I don't mind if you're straight. Just don't flaunt it in public.

      by Chrislove on Sun Apr 13, 2014 at 10:28:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  A person "can be denied employment because of (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Tonedevil

      speech" at any level at any time, and always could be. By using the passive voice, your description hides agency and any specific actions by anyone, and thereby allows any scenario that leads in some way or other to someone being denied employment in some way or other that is in some way related to speech. Some such scenarios are "ok" and some are not.

      And you are arguing as if anyone's talking about setting up some ruling authority to set rules for this. There aren't any such rules or authority. Each individual decides if they want to boycott a product or company, and other people choose to make a similar choice, or not. It's not determined by any kind of authority, but by many independent actors choosing to say what they wish and spend or not spend their money on what they wish. Each individual can make these choices differently. If enough people choose to stop spending their money at a particular business because of a particular employee, whether because of something that employee said or did, or because of any other reason, that person might wind up out of a job because that employee might become a liability to the business. And there is nothing necessarily wrong in that. It has always been such. People can and will disagree about different such scenarios.

      How much easier would it be to get LGBT folks or progressives in general fired from their jobs?
      Since his position is already the norm, and has been in basically every society since the dawn of time, it would be no easier, and no harder.
      If you think the campaign against Eich was okay, you don't have a leg to stand on when you protest the firing of others for their religious, moral, or political beliefs.
      Doesn't follow at all. If I was protesting someone being fired it would not be for the reasons you're using, and which I and others here are refuting.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (135)
  • Community (60)
  • 2016 (43)
  • Environment (39)
  • Elections (37)
  • Republicans (34)
  • Bernie Sanders (34)
  • Culture (33)
  • Hillary Clinton (27)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (24)
  • Climate Change (24)
  • Labor (24)
  • Barack Obama (24)
  • Media (22)
  • Education (22)
  • GOP (21)
  • Civil Rights (20)
  • Affordable Care Act (19)
  • Economy (19)
  • Texas (18)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site