Skip to main content

View Diary: Anything Russian 'in czarist times' is fair game in Putin's mind (405 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Yeah well, that excuse pretty much applies to any (0+ / 0-)

    country we want, right?

    Except when it's the Shah of Iran.
    Or Saddam of Iraq.
    Or General Pinochet of Chile.
    Or Afghanistan in the 80's.
    Or Ghadaffi's Libya.
    Or Baby Doc.
    Or the Contras.
    Or the Taliban in the 90's.
    Or any number of other countries where the U.S. has actively put into power, propped up, or defended brutal dictators, generals, and other "heads of state".

    Hey, how's our good friends in the House of Saud doing these days?  Still jailing their opponents, murdering their own people?

    Funny, that.  So no, I am not moved by the broken-record excuse of "bad man in charge, U.S. needs to take over".

    In fact, I rather recoil when I see the Mighty Empire, drenched in blood, reaching forth a greedy hand to take yet another Geopolitical Piece on the Board, shedding crocodile tears of how bad that country's government is.

    The 1% are Purists: They only support Candidates that Deliver Results They Can Bank On. Don't they know they should compromise? /sarcasm

    by Johnathan Ivan on Sun Apr 20, 2014 at 04:33:31 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Who cares about that? (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Lawrence, jiffypop, DiesIrae

      Do some questionable US activities in the past legitimize Putin's aggression towards Ukraine? No they don't. I don't think the people of Ukraine think that "it's fine for Russia to invade us because the U.S. maybe did something bad too".

      •  Isn't it odd.. that we weren't talking about Putin (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        mosesfreeman

        until after the fall of the Ukranian government?

        A fall which our "Diplomats" - one of whom is married to a Neocon - helped encourage and plotted who would be in power next?

        Gee, you don't suppose the U.S. was doing anything else over there other than verbal encouragement, do ya?  Heavens no!  Not with America's Freedom Loving Track Record.

        Nope.  Doesn't matter.

        Putin bad.

        Obama / D = Good.

        Besides, I hear several corps have some interesting ideas on investment for Ukraine.  Aside from those wonderful Austerity policies - er I mean "aid" - that we're "giving" Ukraine.  For having sided with the West.

        After their government was deposed.

        Because.. Freedom & Democracy.  And there's a Democrat in office.

        Not like the bad ol' days when Bush claimed to care about the Iraqi people when he invaded.  WMD.  Saddam killed his own people!  Oh no - Bush was full of all sorts of lies.  

        But now it's a Democrat doing it.  So it must be all good.

        I get it.  Brand Loyalty.  No matter what.

        The 1% are Purists: They only support Candidates that Deliver Results They Can Bank On. Don't they know they should compromise? /sarcasm

        by Johnathan Ivan on Sun Apr 20, 2014 at 05:08:42 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  We were talking about Russia's involvement before. (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Lawrence

          Reminder how the crisis started: Ukraine was planning to sign off to the association agreement with the EU, until Russia pressured Yanukovych into forgoing it: http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

          During the 3 months of sometimes violent protests, Russia's hand was visible 24/7, especially when "aid" was given on the (secret) condition of cracking down on protesters: http://www.nytimes.com/...

          And as to the brand loyalty, I have serious doubts as to how the Obama administration handled the crisis (and relations with Russia in general). So yes, I am critical towards Democrats as well.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site