Skip to main content

View Diary: My climate change letter botched and butchered by our conservative newspaper in Chattanooga (115 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No, you don't... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sandy on Signal, Oh Mary Oh

    ...want your paper to be more like ours.  Their premier reporter is a guy who does straight news reporting covering the state capitol and also writes a sort of observation/opinion column every Sunday with a decidedly conservative bent.  He apparently sometimes has trouble telling which day it is.  I've never seen him write a straight news report where Gov. Quinn is not described as a "Chicago Democrat" and the recent temporary income tax increase from 3% to 5% is always described as a 66% increase, never a 2% increase.
    This morning's opinion piece was a classic example of how he thinks, as he called out egregious examples of last-week-of-the-session legislative sausage-making:

    Public aid fraud: Some proposed laws make you wonder why there weren't already similar laws on the books. House Bill 5682 is one of those. It makes is a Class C misdemeanor to assist someone in applying for welfare benefits in exchange for cash or a portion of those benefits.
    And I might grant him that.  That is, until I get to the very next item:
    School safety: In a move that could drive up the cost of school construction, a proposed new law would require all new schools to have storm shelters.
    Actually, Kurt, I find it a bit more flabbergasting that the second one isn't already a law.  But I guess that's just the difference in how conservatives think versus liberals.

    We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both. - Justice Louis D. Brandeis

    by dsteffen on Sun Jun 01, 2014 at 01:46:36 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  You can have your own opinions... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      susanala

      ...but you can't have your own math. A tax increase from 3% to 5% is, in fact, a 66% increase, not a "2% increase," though one could describe it as a "2 percentage point increase," which is not the same thing.

      Intended to be a factual statement.

      by ipsos on Sun Jun 01, 2014 at 04:24:53 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  It's both a 2% and a 66% increase (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Oh Mary Oh, Sandy on Signal

        An increase from 3% to 5% is BOTH a 2% increase and a 66% increase, depending on what it's computed as a percentage of. It's an increase by 2% of income, and 66% in the tax rate.

        Given that there are two ways to describe the change, it's telling that they use the more dramatic version consistently.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site