Skip to main content

View Diary: Senate Democrats ready to push Social Security expansion (110 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  There are, of course, no... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ...assurances in high gain investing. However, over the past 20 years, one would have done fairly well dollar cost averaging into an index fund that covers, for example, the DJIA. It's pretty simple and inexpensive (unless your employer's 401(k) plan sucks - which some do WRT fees). It doesn't take a money manager to invest in a broad index fund -- and it's generally unwise to fiddle around with allocations trying to "time the market". People with modest means don't need a money manager -- they don't have to be tax efficient, they are not trying to avoid estate taxes, and they shouldn't be taking high risks.

    But, the point is, the individual is usually free to invest, just as Social Security does, in the safest investment available -- treasury debt or perhaps money market funds in one's 401(k). There is no free lunch for small or large investors - higher gain is correlated with higher risk.

    You can buy a defined benefit plan instead of putting your money into a 401(k) -- they are called annuities (it's probably not a wise investment and one has to be quite careful to not get soaked on fees). But it's quite safe and quite easy.

    I don't understand why people think defined benefit pension plans have magical powers and are secure. Ask the retired municipal workers in Detroit how secure they feel their plan is. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp insures most private plans, but if too many collapse, they will need to be bailed out by the government - but the taxpayers may reject that idea.

    As well, most defined benefit plans in the private sector don't adjust for cost of living -- so they are actually often not very "secure" as a few years of the mid 70's through the early 80's devastates "real" benefits.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site