Skip to main content

View Diary: Mississippi, dependent on federal largess, murders their cash cow today (223 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Yes, in many instances I do Like pork barrel (0+ / 0-)

    spending.  Not all, of course, since it will depend upon what the spending is directed for.  There's plenty of pork barrel spending that is socially progressive or economically Keynesian (which is one of the things government should do, spend money to help the economy).

    There was an entire series of diaries about the value of pork barrel spending back in the 2008 election when John McCain was going on about it.

    Thanks for joining the dk conversation here.

    Welcome to Daily Kos. If you have any questions about how to participate here, you can learn more at the Community Guidelines, the Knowledge Base, and the Site Resource Diaries. Diaries labeled "Open Thread" are also great places to ask. We look forward to your contributions.
    ~~ from the DK Partners & Mentors Team.

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Tue Jun 24, 2014 at 03:30:46 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Thanks for the welcome (0+ / 0-)

      Long-time listener, first-time caller.

      I probably read the John McCain threads in 2008. I don't remember many people on the right calling out Republicans for corporate cronyism back then. If they did, John McCain would have been one of their targets.

      I agree that most government spending is useful and even necessary, but you have to admit that "corporate cronyism" is a nice thing to hear from the other side of the political spectrum. In my experience, there are some opportunities to collaborate with populist conservatives that did not exist before. In my experience, you don't necessarily have to buy into their whole world view to do so. Some of them will even listen to your perspective on other issues.

      •  "Cronyism" does not necessarily = (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        qofdisks

        pork barrel spending, which is as old as the Republic. Getting $ for locales has always been the main bargaining chip leadership could use to whip votes. Without that chip's existence (or its "proper" use), we end up with ideologues unwilling to compromise on or pass anything. Sound familiar?

        "Lone catch of the moon, the roots of the sigh of an idea there will be the outcome may be why?"--from a spam diary entitled "The Vast World."

        by bryduck on Tue Jun 24, 2014 at 04:53:17 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  The problem is that cronyism is no longer local (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          bryduck

          It has gone national or international wealth stripping entire states.

          •  I wish cronyism was the only problem! n/t (0+ / 0-)

            "Lone catch of the moon, the roots of the sigh of an idea there will be the outcome may be why?"--from a spam diary entitled "The Vast World."

            by bryduck on Wed Jun 25, 2014 at 10:51:08 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site