Skip to main content

View Diary: Colorado judge becomes 16th in nation to rule prohibition of same-sex marriages is unconstitutional (39 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  What I'm actually waiting for... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wader, jaf49, glitterlust

    ...is the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on this. They will rule 6-3 most likely. I can't WAIT for the dissenting opinions from Scalia, Alito, and Thomas. Well... maybe not Clarence. He's too stupid to have an opinion at all.

    Or they will take the coward's way out and simply turn it away without comment and wait for all fifty states to enter the 20th Century much less the 21st.

    "Wealthy the Spirit which knows its own flight. Stealthy the Hunter who slays his own fright. Blessed is the Traveler who journeys the length of the Light."

    by CanisMaximus on Wed Jul 09, 2014 at 05:21:40 PM PDT

    •  There's one problem with Scalia (0+ / 0-)

      In his DISSENT of Lawrence v Texas, he said said that if morality can't be used to restrict certain kinds of sexual behavior, how could you restrict same gender couples from civil marriage?
      Now, the conventional wisdom is that he INTENDED that to be a "wake-up call" for an amendment to the Constitutiona to prohibit this, but that ship has sailed.

      "Free your mind and the rest will follow...."

      by midknightryder13 on Fri Jul 11, 2014 at 03:03:23 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site