Skip to main content

View Diary: Senate Democrats set vote on legislation protecting birth control coverage (44 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Yes, but the decision is based on (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kfunk937, DocGonzo

    the Court's determination that the term "person" in the RFRA is not limited to  "individuals, "natural persons" or "human beings" if you will. The term is not defined in the law. The relied on a generic definition in the code where person includes both individuals ant entities. All we need to do is put a definition in. Then the RFRA basis for a suit disappears. They can still try a 1ST Amendment suit but this bill does not deal with that anyway.

    Further, affiant sayeth not. 53959

    by Gary Norton on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 02:52:25 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site