Skip to main content

View Diary: Extremist Conservative Legal Reasoning on Abortion Rights (269 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  The JUDGMENT had 5 votes (none)
    Not the opinion.  Do you know the difference?  Where does it say that anyone else joined their OPINION on any point (except part VE joined by Stevens)?
    •  Wait up (none)
      "Justice BLACKMUN, concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part, and dissenting in part.
      I join Parts I, II, III, V-A, V-C, and VI of the joint opinion of Justices O'CONNOR, KENNEDY, and SOUTER, ante"

      and I'll get the other one in a sec.

      The SCOTUS is Extraordinary.

      by Armando on Mon Aug 08, 2005 at 03:15:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Justice Stevens (none)
      "Justice STEVENS, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The portions of the Court's opinion that I have joined are more important than those with which I disagree. I shall therefore first comment on significant areas of agreement, and then explain the limited character of my disagreement.

      . . . Accordingly, while I disagree with Parts IV, V-B, and V-D of the joint opinion,FN8 I join the remainder of the Court's opinion."

      Hmm, that makes 5.

      Ah young Felderalist Society scholar, what say you now?

      The SCOTUS is Extraordinary.

      by Armando on Mon Aug 08, 2005 at 03:21:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (131)
  • Community (66)
  • Elections (25)
  • Environment (24)
  • Media (23)
  • Culture (22)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Science (21)
  • Law (21)
  • Josh Duggar (20)
  • Labor (19)
  • Ireland (17)
  • Marriage Equality (17)
  • Economy (17)
  • Bernie Sanders (16)
  • Climate Change (15)
  • Hillary Clinton (15)
  • Rescued (15)
  • 2016 (15)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site