Skip to main content

View Diary: The failure of N.O. is not Bush's failure (149 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I have read this thread, and I don't (none)
    believe that some of you have read it. Frankly, this is a big problem on this blog. Not to bring up a meta point- but what exactly are those of you who argue that we shouldn't make this about idealogy arguing against? In practical terms- how do you think making this about idealogy will not also include Bush. Making this about idealogy is more inclusive than making this about Bush. It's a question fo basica logic. How does discussing Bush alone secure an idealogical discussion? How does focusing on how the Republican idealogy is morally bankrupt not include Bush? The answer to the first question is that discussing Bush alone does not secure an idealogical discussion. However, the later question does require a discussion of both.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site