Skip to main content

View Diary: Surrender Dems (442 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  So there will never be change? (none)
    If each justice is supposed to mirror the positions and attitudes of the justice he/she is replacing, that means the ideological composition of the court will never change. (Unless, of course, a stealth candidate gets in.)

    And if we are further and further constrained in our choices because of the attitudes or positions of some dead and gone justices, what's the point?

    As if those constraints aren't enough, we're presented with candidates who are so reprehensible (and/or whacko - or dare I say -stealth?), that they refuse to share their previous writings or explain their thinking or position on ANYTHING. And Congree obliges by not requiring full (hell - even partial) disclosure. I couldn't get a job as a crash dummy if I interviewed like that!

    What is the point?

    Just what the fuck is the point?


    Some days I just run put of hope and belief in the future of this country.

    And Congress doesn't help.

    We must have stem-cell research. How else will Congress and the media grow spines?

    by bablhous on Wed Sep 21, 2005 at 11:19:34 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site