Skip to main content

View Diary: A response to Tom Vilsack (148 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  "schooling" vs. "learning" (none)
    No "schooling" is ever comprehensive.  There's always something more to be discovered...that's the joy of "learning".  

    I went to a large high school (2000 students) which still wasn't large enough to offer a course that would satisfy my curiosity about Brasilian Portuguese.  So, years later when I was on my own and still curious, I studied the language for two years -- one year of non-credit continuing ed classes and one year of private study.  I had a ball doing it, and now have an additional skill that I use almost daily.  

    The endpoint of "schooling" ought to be teaching people to love the learning process, and take responsibility for continuing to learn on their own, throughout life.  

    •  absolutely (none)
      Learning how to learn should be the #1 priority.

      Anyone here familiar with Problem-Based Learning? It's based around a "what do you know" v. "what you'd like to find out" and then letting students research answers for themselves.

      Take a medical case, for example. You interview a woman in her 40s who's experiencing pain in her right leg. What would you need to learn in order to diagnose her? What other questions do you have for her?

      There is medical school that teaches their doctors in just this manner. Totally planned and managed problems constructed so that students indeed learn everything they'll "need to know." Each case is designed so that students will have to explore various issues, concepts, etc. throughout their education. Let's see...yep, it's Southern Illinois University. I participated in a workshop where we used this method to try and solve a particular medical case in one day. It was pretty eye-opening.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site