Skip to main content

View Diary: What a ScAlito Court Would Mean to Me (219 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  The article reads... (none)
    He also argued that the FMLA was unconstitutional because "there was no evidence for the notion that women are disadvantaged in the workplace when they are not allowed to take family leave. Furthermore, he argued, the requirement that everyone be guaranteed 12 weeks of unpaid family leave was a disproportionately strong remedy"

    How is that what you just wrote?  These are very clearly arguments aimed at the 11th and 14th amendments. Not to FMLA constitutionality which is independently supported by the commerce clause.

    Maybe I've uncovered the problem.  You're the one having a hard time reading.

    •  Because (none)
      It is not what I just worte.

      That came after the flip.

      To wit, in context, as a normal human being would read it, he ruled that Congress exceeded his power because of those reaosns.

      Are you really still pushing this BS? Do yourself a favor, fes up. You fucked up.

      Let's dust ourselves off and move on.

      The SCOTUS is Extraordinary.

      by Armando on Fri Nov 04, 2005 at 07:06:03 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site