Skip to main content

View Diary: GOP tries to disenfranchise WA voters with false challenges (130 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  That's actually the point (none)
    She is obligated to be at each hearing, but it's obvious she isn't planning to be there.  That isn't relevant to the perjury charge, however - the perjury relates to her knowledge that these registrations are illegal, knowledge that we now know she didn't have.  

    If she doesn't show at the hearings, the challenges are just thrown out and that's the end of the issue from the voter's standpoint.

    •  Yes - but we should be sure that she is charged (none)
      with perjury for each and every count.

      Because if we do not stop them - effectively stop them this time -- make them pay big time for each and every one of them.

      What will stop them next time.

      They should not be allowed to do this -- make people have to go to get this fixed at hearings and then this bitch just stay at home on Mercer Island laughing at these poor slobs.

      She should get charged for each and every one of them.

      Proud to be a Bleeding Heart Liberal

      by sara seattle on Sun Nov 06, 2005 at 03:22:20 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Right, but (none)
        the perjury charges and her appearance at the hearings are completely unrelated.  Just fyi.
        •  If I had received a letter (none)
          and then had to go to a hearing and she was not there --

          I would be even more livid of the nerve of this woman to make me jump through hoops -- and she sataying home -- acting like nothing happened.

          So let us hope that she does stay home -- for sure any number of people are going to take her to court because of this added obscenity,

          Proud to be a Bleeding Heart Liberal

          by sara seattle on Sun Nov 06, 2005 at 07:07:42 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site