Skip to main content

View Diary: Clinton sponsors anti-flag burning law (461 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No one has even mentioned (4.00)
    the other co-sponsors of this bill - Sens. Conrad (D-ND), Dorgan (D-ND), and Byrd (D-WV).  I guess it wouldn't be easy to summon up the same kind of raw, virulent hatred for these three gentlemen as I've seen throughout these comments, so maybe that's why no one bothered.

    Mind you, I wouldn't confuse any of these three with Barbara Boxer or John Conyers, but I am proud of their record in the Senate.  And while I don't agree with this silly flag-burning legislation, I assume they support it because it's something they legitimately feel, and it really doesn't bother me.

    But no one ever gives Hillary an inch of credit for having a single belief of her own - at least not on this site.  Too many people have been listening to Rush talk about how she's nothing but unbridled ambition, and I guess everyone has decided this is the one time they can trust Rush.

    •  All these guys come from red states (none)
      they need some coverage on their right flank, and that doesn't bother me, what bothers me is Hillary's naked (ooh, that's a queasy thought) opportunism.
      •  Yes (none)
        Because Byrd's reelection is really in doubt?

        I don't agree that these three Democrats are sponsoring the bill purely for political reasons.  But I find it very interesting that you have no problem with them acting out of pure politics, but you find something sinister in Hillary doing the same.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site