Skip to main content

View Diary: Clinton sponsors anti-flag burning law (461 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I didn't say political, I said tactical (none)
    meaning in this case, she's taking a position on an issue she expects to be confronted by, so as to diffuse it before it matters.

    rather than evaluate it as such, you just lumped her in with O'Reilly and presumable would rather see Condi Rice in 2008 than that sell out Hillary.

    which bring us to the part of my post you apparantly didn't read, which is we lose again in 2008 because you'd rather lose than conceede she might have a tactical point. and then we'll be faced with another 12 year run of GOP presidents picking SCOTUS judges along with the rest of the judicial spots, and be even further away from righting the ship of state than we are now.

    I don't like the position she's taking. It pisses me off that its even necessary as a tactic. I hate what the right has done to this country that makes it so. But vote for them just to punish Hillary? If we are that fucking stupid we deserve everthing we get.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (130)
  • Community (63)
  • Bernie Sanders (44)
  • Elections (36)
  • Hillary Clinton (28)
  • Culture (28)
  • 2016 (27)
  • Climate Change (27)
  • Civil Rights (23)
  • Science (23)
  • Environment (23)
  • Spam (21)
  • Law (19)
  • Labor (18)
  • Media (18)
  • Republicans (18)
  • Barack Obama (17)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (15)
  • White House (14)
  • International (13)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site