Skip to main content

View Diary: [Updated] Ohio to outlaw recounts and shield Diebold (196 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  In the diary entry the quote box mentioned (3.50)
    That it would make illegal recounts for elections to federal office. The bill does no such thing. It simply doesn't apply that section of Ohio law to federal office elections.

    While this leaves the whole prospect of how federal office election results could be challenged but it is simply not correct to claim it would be illegal. Disinformation doesn't help. If it were stated correctly people coukd discuss it from the proper standpoint. The reason why this is important is so that some democrat candidate doesn't go out stating that it would be illegal to recount federal office elections and they would rightly be called wrong and potentially come off looking like an idiot.

    When it comes to dealing with the republicans we must have our facts straight and be accurate lest we get clobbered on a technicality and the interested voters would get confused.

    •  didn't the quote box say 'challenges'? (none)
      I don't think that rises to the level of 'disinformation' -- 'uninformation,' pretty much.

      But Fitrakis and Wasserman's piece on the GAO report was somewhere between a stretch and a whopper, and their piece on Ohio 2005 was poor, and their response to Hertsgaard's article was a muddle, so skepticism is warranted.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site