Skip to main content

View Diary: Energize America - A Blueprint for U.S. Energy Security (Fourth Draft) (311 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Incoherent Objection (none)
    You argue that we shouldn't pursue this package of imaginative regulatory reforms and clean energy subsidies because we'll be seen as Tax 'n Spenders, then turn around and suggest that all our goals could be better met through...taxes.  

    I'm undecided myself about whether to prefer a simple tax-the-bad approach or the more hands-on approach laid out here, but I don't think you've accurately pinpointed the politics of the choice between them.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (130)
  • Community (65)
  • Bernie Sanders (44)
  • Elections (40)
  • 2016 (38)
  • Climate Change (33)
  • Environment (32)
  • Culture (31)
  • Hillary Clinton (29)
  • Science (27)
  • Republicans (26)
  • Media (25)
  • Civil Rights (24)
  • Barack Obama (24)
  • Education (23)
  • Law (21)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Economy (19)
  • Congress (17)
  • Labor (16)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site