Skip to main content

View Diary: Comparing Bush to Hitler: Is it Reasonable? (74 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  There are many legitimate comparisons (4.00)
    to the Third Reich and the Fourth Reich of GWB.

    Hitler had the Volkischer Beobachter and Der Sturmer.  Spreading lies and hate.  Bush has Fox News, and talk radio, not to mention numerous known and unknown paid hustlers in the media.  Including Judy Miller and Bob Woodward, Jeff "Cocksucker" Gannon, Armstrong "Uncle Tom" Williams, etc. etc. etc.

    Dachau was the beginning of the domestic terror employed by Hitler.  No different than Gitmo.  Where American citizens can be arbitrarily declared enemy combatants, denied habeas corpus, held incommunicado and fucking tortured.  And killed.

    Nazis torture and kill detainees.  REAL Americans don't.

    Hitler destroyed the trade unions.  Ditto for Bush.

    Hitler had Goebbels, a brilliant, ruthless, amoral political operative and propagandist.  Bush has Karl Rove.  Who has everything Goebbels had except charm.

    Hitler was a lying motherfucker.  Bush?  A motherfucking liar.

    Hitler was a vegetarian.  Bush eats the meat.

    Hitler was courageous in battle, by all indications.  Bush is a fucking coward.

    Hitler had military successes.  Bush not so.

    Hitler was popular with the ladies.  Bush is popular with the white boys, who smoke cigars, that resemble in a frighteningly Freudian way the external genitalia of a male African American.

    If we're dumb. Then God is dumb. And maybe a little ugly on the side.

    by Ghost of Frank Zappa on Thu Dec 29, 2005 at 01:28:53 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site