Skip to main content

View Diary: Matthews implicated in Abramoff scandal (210 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  asdf (none)
    Reid "has denied that his intercession in an Indian casino case that would've helped Abramoff was linked to a $5,000 contribution from an Abramoff client."

    Notice how they put Reid before Bush, even though it's a proven fact that "Bush received more than $100,000 through Abramoff during his re-election campaign in 2004."

    How completely unsurprising.

    Here's a link: http://www.signonsandiego.com/...

    "This White House doesn't even know where the buck is." - Wes Clark

    by PeterSD on Wed Jan 04, 2006 at 09:28:59 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Thanks. (none)
      Now I see. This is the TM (traditional media) digging to be "balanced" by twisting a tiny contribution into a bribe so that they can say this scandal involves both parties. As though Harry Reid was just some kind of congressional cheap date at a mere $5000 compared with hundreds of thousands for the others.

      Ugh. Well at least I can fight the spin with facts now.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site