Skip to main content

View Diary: The Ethic of (Ir)Responsibility (238 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Responsibility? (none)
    Why the constant focus on Nader as being the one "RESPONSIBILE FOR BUSH'S (S)ELECTION?"  I don't agree, but even if his running did take some votes away from Gore, so what?  Everything anybody did that took votes away from Gore is also RESPONSIBILE FOR BUSH'S (S)ELECTION, including all the corrupt political whoring  Gore did with Johnny Chung (also one of Kerry's money guys), the DLC's focus on criticizing fellow Democrats instead of Republicans, Clinton's oral fixation, and Lieberman's (and Gore's) sanctimony.  Why make principalled old Ralph the scapegoat?  If we're talking about RESPONSIBILITY FOR BUSH'S (S)ELECTION, let's talk about it.  Hell, Bush was appointed by Clarence Thomas and Gore voted to confirm Thomas (and probably Scalia too).

    Revolution in our lifetime

    by kaleidescope on Fri Feb 27, 2004 at 06:46:46 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site