Skip to main content

View Diary: Battle Plan for Iran: The Khuzestan Gambit (90% of Iran's Oil) (246 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  They will not be able to assemble any sizable (none)
    force in those mountains just as the Taliban cannot in Afghanistan.

    Air-Land devastates any large third world force.

    IT's as simple as that.

    •  Yes... (none)
      we learned that lesson in Vietnam didn't we?  Won every major battle too.  Think about that.

      We will never invade Iran.  The best we can do is try to influence elections and gin up subversion of the Mullahs.  Yet even the old "lets put in a new King" trick is probably out of the question.  Most of the older Iranians probably still harbor a bit of resentment from the last time that was done, and the younger ones study it in their history books.

      It is bad foreign policy to make enemies faster than you can kill them.

      by Paulie200 on Fri Feb 24, 2006 at 12:13:09 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  The Iranians (none)
      Used human wave attacks, ala the Chinese in the Korean war at great cost in lives to throw the Iraqis out of Iran. Iraq had gotten within shelling distance of Tehran early in the war.

      Granted we do not have a third world military but just like in Korea where we had military equipment and training superiority it all came down to whether or not there was enough ammunition, shells, bombs, etc or guns didn't jam before they got to you.

      There is no telling how the Iranians would play it but were they to pull off a successful human wave assault the U.S. casualties would be higher than the public would accept.

      That all aside. I would expect that Iran learned quite a bit through our debacle in Iraq and how to tie us down using guerilla tactics.

      Lastly, there is always the possibility that Iran would not wait to be attacked and could push across the Faw peninsula and cut the supply lines out of Kuwait. Their opportunity to do so would only be before we have moved large forces to the south of Iraq. We can't do this without it being known to the Iranians who have agents all over the south of Iraq.

      If something like that were to happen - even if the Iranians couldn't hold that advance - it would disrupt supplies to our soldiers that remain in Mosul, Anbar, Diyala and that could result in disasters all over Iraq.

      There are a lot of ifs but some things to keep in mind.

    •  Beware the claims of air power enthusiasts (none)
      Air power enthusiasts have been arguing since Douhet in the 1920s that massive air power can win wars on its own.  So far, that hasn't occurred, unless that air power was employing atomic or nuclear weaponry, against targets like cities.  Air power is effective only in conjunction with active ground operations.  The mountain terrain of Afghanistan bears comparison with the Zagros, but I wonder whether the natural environment in the two places differs.  The Pamirs of Afghanistan show little vegetation; if the Zagros are wooded, that complicates reconnaissance and targeting.  Besides, even in the bare Pamirs, the Soviets had both absolute air superiority during their war in Afghanistan, and no moral scruples about its use, and still failed.  And mountains, wooded mountains in particular, make it much easier to infiltrate enemy positions, as we discovered in Vietnam and earlier in Korea (before a continuous front was established).  

      Another problem we will face, which we did not in Afghanistan (but the Soviets did) is that the Iranians facing us in Khuzestan will have a large base area in their rear which we will not be able to conquer and occupy.  That base area will be vulnerable to air attack, it's true, but air attack didn't prove particularly effective at halting the movement of supplies through mountains in Vietnam, in Korea, or in Italy during WW2.  Since we won't have the manpower for a continuous front on the model of Italy or Korea, the outposts we establish in the mountains above Khuzestan will become like "fire bases" Vietnam, always under a low level of siege, the troops inside them vulnerable to ambush whenever they venture out, and the mountains will in turn provide cover for infiltration into the oil fields that lie at their feet.  It is the scenario for a war that draws in a large number of troops, drags on endlessly, and produces casulaties in a steady stream, not the current trickle.

    •  meh (none)
      You seem to ignore the fact that there is a pretty sizeable Iranian security presence in Khuzestan already. You know army, airforce and navy, internal security, intelligence - the whole fucking shebang - and if you think that infiltration of territory by the people who own it and know it intimately could be forestalled, then you're in the severely delusional category.

      Iran is not the Taliban - it's a complex and united country, there's no civil war going on, and they have shed-loads of cash, weaponry, and will to do what is necessary to protect themselves from external aggression.

      You go to war against the Iranians that you have, not the Iranians that you'd like to have...

    •  Sherlock, do you really think it would all be (none)
      confined to Khuzestan?  Look at the entire border with Iraq, and any other country that we use to stage an attack from is going to get hit in the first day by CBW warheads.  It's a foregone conclusion that Iran would send scores of missiles at Israel, particularly its nuclear sites.  The Israelis will retaliate, likely with nuclear strikes on Iranian strategic targets.  Hundreds of thousands of people will die on all sides.  Iraqi Shi'a will rise up en masse.  Pakistan might get into it, as well.

      Then, there's the impact on the US economy.  $10/gal gas is quite possible.  Then there are the very real longterm consequences of surviving Iranian scientists cobbling together radiological dirty bombs and finding a way to ship them into the Ports of NY, Phil., Baltimore, Boston, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco . . .

      Do you really think the Joint Chiefs are going to do this ?  For what, so the same treasonous GOP politicians and neocons who got us into the Iraq morrass can get reelected?  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site