Skip to main content

View Diary: Ion Sancho - Election official hammered for telling the truth. Enter the lawyers... (269 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Right (4.00)
    That's my point, that your inference is not supported by what I wrote.

    The revolution will not be televised, but we'll analyze it to death at The Next Hurrah.

    by Dana Houle on Thu Mar 09, 2006 at 06:06:45 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  My point is: (none)
      (Damn, this is getting tedious)

      I stated from the start that it was my inference, not your implication, about recommenders being equated to cultists.

      You can call it simplistic, you can insult my reading skills, but it doesn't change the fact that I freely stated that it was my interpretation of your words.

      At this point, it seems we are clear that I drew an inference from your comment which you did not intend to make. (Actually, I don't think you didn't intend to make it, I think you're just disclaiming it as a technical reason for derailing the argument from the more substantial point, which is that you did insult the people who recommended this diary.)

      Anyway, you can have your insults and your arguments about the exact wording and nature of your insult.

      I'm going to sleep.

      congratulations on your foreskin -- osteriser

      by bartman on Thu Mar 09, 2006 at 06:13:24 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site