Skip to main content

View Diary: HR 1606, the debate (41 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Try to be consistent (0+ / 0-)

    So now you're clearly saying that DailyKos is not in imminent danger? If so, you should edit this diary to make that clear, because the talking points clearly imply something different:

    for example, its proponents are unwilling to say whether it even protects DailyKos.  And given that its proponents have made it clear in the past that they don't want sites like this to operate freely, no politician who claims to be a "friend of the netroots" should want to clear the path for this site's regulation.  

    ... and in your first post: "The FEC couldn't have made it any clearer.  HR 1606 passes, or they regulate.  "

    Also: "use some common sense: if money was spent online to influence your vote in 2004, you'd have noticed it. "
    yeah, I did.  And it worried me, because it's completely undercover.  Still does.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site