View Story | 99 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
What the US isn't willing to admit yet is that Iraq is three countries, Southern Kurdistan, Iraq (Suni), and the Islamic Republic of Iraq (Shia). No one suggested that Yugoslavia remain one country, so why do we insist that Iraq remain one country? Iraq as it exists is a construct of British colonialism, held together by Saddam and the leaders that came before him. Lacking a charismatic leader that can united the Iraqi people, let Iraq splinter and settle back into it's historic ethnic enclaves.
-- "Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
by Gary on Sun Nov 09, 2003 at 03:26:28 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
Check out my blog if you like discussion of the Middle East and other random topics.
by Brian Ulrich on Sun Nov 09, 2003 at 05:28:30 PM PDT
And no, that doesn't mean that I approved of Hussein's original invasion of Kuwait. Just that he seized on a kernal of historic truth to use as cover for his power-grab.
It's pronounced "Gooey-Duck"!
by geoduck on Sun Nov 09, 2003 at 05:50:29 PM PDT
by Brian Ulrich on Sun Nov 09, 2003 at 08:32:10 PM PDT
And so is Northern Ireland. Your point? Just because two regions are 'more or less' the same, from an outsiders eyes, does not mean that they 'want' to be considered one state.
by Gary on Sun Nov 09, 2003 at 11:52:30 PM PDT
by Brian Ulrich on Mon Nov 10, 2003 at 12:56:49 AM PDT
W was elected to protect Them from Us.
by Radical Middle on Mon Nov 10, 2003 at 02:47:16 AM PDT
The "ethnic cleansing" analogy works really well, however. Which Britain and The Orange Order continue to try and work through.
by Canuck Coot on Mon Nov 10, 2003 at 01:44:35 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 99 comments