View Story | 194 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
He also has a point. Many of the Dean supporters will stay home in Novemeber if Dean does not win. Part of the support for him is a referendum on the Democratic establishment. They see the other candidates as either being a part of the eslablishment, or backed in secret by the extablishment.
This is just a plain old fact. I would urge them not to, but I think that mant of them have made up their mind.
I will say that I will at least hold my nose while voting for some of the other candidates. That is the least that I can do as a Democrat.
Todo Bien: It's All Good Young Philly Politics
by charlesdog12 on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 07:25:32 PM PDT
Not that it will be an issue.
by katiebird on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 07:32:48 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
by PLS on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 10:41:47 PM PDT
I prefer this brand of Socratic inquiry, actually: WTF is wrong with you?
by lightiris on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 11:20:32 PM PDT
Bush the Elder had a healthcare plan. As a lame duck president looking for a place in history, it would have been a cinch to push him farther along towards a national healthcare system. Instead, I watched the arrogance of President Clinton appointing his wife to come up with a plan and she completely blew it like it wasn't important.
Clinton's presidency facilitated the rise of Republicans like DeLay; there was a non-ideological personal animus towards Clinton among so many Americans and it empowered Republicans like DeLay the most.
So I look back at those years and I'm not so sure I would vote for any Democrat nominated if Dean didn't make it. Kerry and Gephardt - what to make of them? They voted against the first Gulf War resolution back in '90-'91. How to explain the way they were so supportive of this war? I have the same feeling about them as I had with Clinton: I'm not sure I know what their priorities and values are. Clark is a total mystery. What to make of him? He voted for Reagan and Bush I and he's had a career of carrying out orders. What does he really believe?
by Lois on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 08:29:25 PM PDT
Get over it Lois it was ten years ago
and you're threatening to not vote just tells me you're a typical dont want to take responsibilty for anything person.
by mickey on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 08:42:19 PM PDT
Strategically, IMO, we'd be in a better place without the Clinton presidency and thats what its all about. I'm not getting paid anything by the Democratic Party.
by Lois on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 08:56:05 PM PDT
... now watch this drive.
by jg on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 09:27:26 PM PDT
I agree, and I would add, for gods sake I'm so sick of the whining and crying about Dean. IMHO this diary entry is just another attempt to smear Dean under the guise of some greater issue, in this case, party unity.
Freedom is what you do with what's been done to you. Jean-Paul Sartre
by Stevo on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 09:33:13 PM PDT
-fair point, and many supporters of other Dem candidates may stay home if Dean does get the nom.
by jdavidson on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 09:03:15 PM PDT
But I also think most Dean supporters would probably not be manning tables. Wouldn't be going door to door. Wouldn't be sending in their $10 and $20. This is not because they'd be being peevish. It's because it would all depend on whether or not other candidates could inspire them in the way that Dean had.
Although anyone could try. And someone might succeed.
This race is all about respect. It's about changing the relationship between campaigners and their constituents.
Bush will not be defeated unless the candidate who's going up against him can marshal 100 times the effort and dedication that Howard Dean is marshalling among his supporters now. This is nothing, what's going on now. This is a walk in the park compared to facing the GOP. Sheer numbers alone cannot change the country's course. Neither can money. The equation is very simple -- the frontrunner, whoever it is, has to make his supporters give 2000 percent.
A candidate who cannot inspire Dean's supporters to give 2000 percent in the general election, will not win. Because even Dean has to inspire his supporters to give 2000 percent. No one gets a free ride.
by NYCO on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 09:12:31 PM PDT
With FISA like these, who needs enemies?
by chase on Sun Dec 28, 2003 at 09:44:37 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 194 comments