The thing is, it should be so easy to refute Bush's claims of humanitarian reasons for going into Iraq, if people would only dig a bit. There's a little-known quote from an ABC "This Week" interview during the 2000 campaign which could really kill Bush's humanitarian credibility if people will pick it up and start spreading it around:

When asked in an interview if the "world community" should stop ethnic cleansing if it could, Bush said, "I disagree with that. I think the president of the United States must clearly delineate what's in our national strategic interests. Europe is in our national strategic interest, the Far East is in our national strategic interest, our neighborhood is in our national strategic interest, as is the Middle East. But beyond that, the United States is going to have to work with organizations like the United Nations to encourage them to stop genocide. We should not send our troops to stop ethnic cleansing and genocide in nations outside our strategic interest. I don't like genocide and I don't like ethnic cleansing, but the president must set clear parameters as to where troops ought to be used and when they ought to be used." When the interviewer asked if Bush would do anything if another Rwanda took place, Bush said, "I would work with a world organizations and encourage them to move, but I would not commit our troops."

Cites for this are at ABCNews.com, CNN.com, and a mirror of Gore's factsheet on Bush. A transcript of the entire interview is apparently available here, but it would cost $20--anyone out there feel like dropping $20 for a chance to nail Bush where it counts, and send it on to the Dean and Clark campaigns?