View Story | 217 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
I was going to rate this diary. But just as I was clicking on the rate-all button, my finger touched the roller & it changed my rate to a 1, rather than the rating I meant.
This is always my fear when I want to rate posts. I always worry that If I don't press the rate-all button for each one, that I will accidentally scroll a previous rating to something I don't mean.
Sorry about being off topic, but it really rattled me.
by katiebird on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 04:42:14 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
-- Rick Robinson
The best fortress is to be found in the love of the people - Niccolo Machiavelli
by al Fubar on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 04:49:52 PM PDT
by mbc on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 04:58:38 PM PDT
I might never have noticed that I had done it.
And then, it wouldn't get fixed.
by katiebird on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 05:01:40 PM PDT
by gxschier on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 06:37:27 PM PDT
Don't know if you can "un-rate" when you hadn't intended to rate at all, but I know that you can change a rating that you didn't intend.
by sheba on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 05:01:41 PM PDT
Pollkatz: Bush Approval
by Bruce Webb on Mon Jan 19, 2004 at 04:16:41 AM PDT
by bbuster on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 05:06:50 PM PDT
by jsavage on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 05:19:36 PM PDT
blog | -6.13, -5.95 | Live every week like it's Shark Week.
by folkbum on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 05:29:15 PM PDT
This has bothered me for a while. I have yet to see a count of 2 or higher for a rating of None.
Democrats stand for Liberty, Security, Support of Families and Opportunity Whiskey Tango Foxtrot - over
by Rick B on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 06:58:51 PM PDT
none/1 is when just 1 person has rated the post.
i toss out ratings often, just because i believe good posts should be rewarded, and because i feel it's part of our duty to try and rate accurately.
a sometimes genius
by skaiserbrown on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 07:15:18 PM PDT
You're not alone here, don't you know? ;)
The "none" (or whatever you set it to) in the dropdown box is the rating that you have given (or will give if you hit "Rate all").
by Felix Deutsch on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 07:25:44 PM PDT
I am of course ignoring the real ratings that also appear in the list for this discussion. Any rating that is 1 through 4 also seems to have a reasonable number after it, such as 4.00/2 or something. It is merely the None/1 's which strike me as curious.
by Rick B on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 08:40:04 PM PDT
The one next to the totals means overall rating for this post and it takes at least 2 ratings to change a "none" to an overall average. Otherwise "none/1" is show, regardless of the rating.
by Felix Deutsch on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 08:52:55 PM PDT
If I rate your comment as a 4:Excellant [as, of course, everything which falls on the screen from your keyboard obviously deserves], and I am the first to do so, it will appear as None/1 because there is only a single rating of any numerical value. Only when a second rating is applied would there be an average posted.
Have I got it?
Though, if that is the case, I see nothing wrong with a 4.00/1 as an average.
by Rick B on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 09:09:40 PM PDT
It's because it should be at least two votes for an overall rating to count, for they contribute to your trusted user status (many recent good ratings give you special powers).
BTW you can check out the individual ratings by clicking on the "none/1" (or whatever is displayed).
by Felix Deutsch on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 09:49:03 PM PDT
Now, for the always existing political question. Who established the rule that only two or more ratings count? Kos? Whoever designed the system we are using? Someone else?
And is there a user's guide of all the features on this commenting system? If so, is there an ~index~ that we not-so-geeky-ones can use to get quick answers to the system details (not to say quirks - no no, I would NEVER say quirks.)
by Rick B on Mon Jan 19, 2004 at 07:37:28 PM PDT
I understand that each time some separate individual rates a comment from 1:Troll through 4:Excellant, there will be an average provided with the number of separate ratings included in the average. 3.33/3 is clearly three ratings, one 4 and two 3's made by three people.
"None" is not a numerical rating, however. Yet I see ratings of None/0 and None/1. I have not seen a None/2 or higher denominator.
My question was what is the difference between None/0 and None/1? None is the default, that is, unrated.
It isn't a major problem, just a matter of mild curiosity. Does it have any meaning? Or is it an undocumented feature of the kind that MickySoft seems so happy to provide us with?
by Rick B on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 08:55:11 PM PDT
by Bruce Webb on Mon Jan 19, 2004 at 04:22:27 AM PDT
since for the most part I consider these ratings a huge pissing contest.
And don't knock the rating system. I rarely have the time to run through 147+ comments but when I know I have 15 minutes to check in it's nice to be able to scan quickly to the couple "hot spots."
The polls don't tell us how a candidate is doing; they tell us how the media is doing.
by Thumb on Sun Jan 18, 2004 at 06:41:19 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 217 comments