Daily Kos

View Story | 13 comments

  •  If it costs $1,000 (none / 0)

    to pay for one person for three years in Sub-Saharan Africa, where I expect the average annual income is about the same amount, then we should attack the drug companies with guns and clubs, it can't cost that much to manufacture and profits from such trade are sinful and ought to be criminal.
    But that's not my point. Already I've seen a $10 contribution to a local candidate, which you'll match, so the candidate gets $20, what difference will that particular contribution make? It won't get that candidate elected, although you'll certainly score some karma, but someone's going to go without medication (with a much more definitive result) in order to accommodate that karma boost, how can that be justified?

    (0+ / 0-), (0+ / 0-), it's off to kos I go...

    by doorguy on Thu Oct 21, 2004 at 01:19:52 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  and let me express great respect (none / 0)

      for what you are doing in Sub Saharan Africa, I don't mean to be argumentative, but this offer seems, well, maybe a little more complex than my feeble little brain can accommodate.

      (0+ / 0-), (0+ / 0-), it's off to kos I go...

      by doorguy on Thu Oct 21, 2004 at 01:23:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  $1 a day (none / 0)

      norm say in Nairobi metro area, about USD$35 month for ARV drugs, and about 10,000Ksh (USD$134) for a comprehensive treatment program.

      Median income is $2-$5 a day, depending on assumptions and what area you choose; income in a subsistance farming area can be much lower than in a slum like Kibera or Dandora/Eastlands and still be a higher standard of living.

      real cost of the drugs to the generic manufacturers is something close to $1/day (two combined doses). Nothing wrong with that.

      Mind you, for a tenth of what Bush's Iraq war has and will cost ...

      (check to David Dill campaign cut, sent AM 21st ...) (thanks Tim, got email)

View Story | 13 comments