View Story | 613 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
The fundamental moment when this race was lost was when congressional Democrats successfully blocked Bush's attempt to limit overtime pay.
Although those limits would have terribly hurt many real people it kept the Middle Class from seeing how threatened they are by Bush.
We should not obstruct the Republican agenda; this only helps carry their water. The people have chosen and I say that we should let them have it; this is the only way that Americans will learn.
It took the Great Depression for America to wake up in the 30's and embrace Liberalism. Americans forgot these lessons and they need to deeply suffer this lapse.
They need to feel the rod they have chosen this for themselves; let them hemorrhage their losses.
If you have got a boss, you need a union. Read www.purpleocean.org/blog/
by BartBoris on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 12:56:20 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
I will not obstruct the Republican agenda but I will work to build a grass roots media made up of citzen opinion journalist who will tell the truth about their agenda.
by BartBoris on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 01:06:11 PM PDT
by LuckyLu on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 01:13:58 PM PDT
I think we start with blue state legislatures. Lots of things we can do to stick it to the man there. I'm thinking of marijuana initiatives on the California ballot, I'm thinking of challenging the federal government's role in schedule II narcotics enforcement based on the takings clause and state's rights, I'm thinking of attaching a rider to a bill that other than the District of Columbia, states should only be able to get out of the welfare system what they put in, I'm talking about giving tax breaks to companies that get rated on a progressive scale.
In short, I'm talking about economic warfare.
TexasDemocrat Giggity giggity giggity...Iraq's a Quagmire
by TexasDemocrat on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 02:40:36 PM PDT
by SteveLCo on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 06:49:32 PM PDT
It is against republican principles to vote handouts. These red state people need us.
BTW, here is a listing of farm subsidies
Farm subsidies database
In case the link doesn't work it's www.ewg.org/farm
by Jim Beard on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 08:36:13 AM PDT
by kycole on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 11:31:54 AM PDT
One showing the read and blue states --
The other showing all the soldiers that have died - what states they came from for the most part -- it was the blue states.
We not only pay for you - we bleed for you - and we die for you.
"Proud to proclaim: I am a Bleeding Heart Liberal"
by sara seattle on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 04:32:48 PM PDT
by mimi9 on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 06:05:26 PM PDT
"The survival value of intelligence is that it allows us to extinct a bad idea, before the idea extincts us." -- Karl Popper
by eyeswideopen on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 07:51:47 PM PDT
by nedog on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 08:54:21 PM PDT
by Rocket on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 03:18:13 AM PDT
I think it's clear that the terrorists are responding to our actions in the Middle East. Has nothing to do with 'freedom.'
That said, ending Red State Welfare is an excellent idea.
Starts when you're always afraid...
by drgardner on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 03:34:59 AM PDT
Let them do without for a time.
by BartBoris on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 08:32:21 AM PDT
by kycole on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 11:34:08 AM PDT
by kycole on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 11:34:38 AM PDT
Sounds about right. So G.W.Bush's strategery is to take away our freedoms so OBL can no longer hate us for our freedoms.
Rovists are Red, Kossacks are Blue, Send Karl to Jail, and take Bush along too.
by JamesK on Sun Nov 07, 2004 at 11:48:10 AM PDT
I didn't find the exact link you spoke of on Newsweek but I did find an extremely thorough casualties site. Your statement appears to be correct.
http://icasualties.org/oif/
by hayless on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 05:42:34 AM PDT
And maybe it was even more than 50%, if the speculation about Diebold is on the mark.
Also, if education suffers it'll be even harder --in the long term-- to win hearts and minds to our side. The Republicans, on the other hand, will only grow stronger as the population gets progressively more and more ignorant.
Have you read the The Democrats' Da Vinci Code?
by Nate Roberts on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 04:56:43 PM PDT
by eyeswideopen on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 07:56:31 PM PDT
Let me tell you, they know they don't put in, they won't raise their own state taxes, it just gives them an excuse to do nothing. Like Mexico. When ever there's problems in Mexico, they send their people North. They don't reform, they do not bother to help the economy or the poor. The Blue states need to expand, people need to support their own, and when the recession hits from the skyrocketing deficit hits, at least those states will have the buffer.
I can assure Fed funds are NOT appreciated in MS, unless they go to company, or organization, or a defense contractor (they have dozens here).
by lilorphant on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 09:27:04 AM PDT
I make my own money, and I pay a lot of it out in taxes. I can't afford to keep giving it away like this. I live in an area with a high cost of living. I have compassion for others, but if they insist on voting in a way that makes me less safe, places me further into debt, provides me with good healthcare but I have to pay a large portion of my salary to get it, and puts their nose into my business via the Patriot Act and whole gay-marrige thing.
Sorry, but when I hear claims that America's soul is on the heartland, real values, all that crap, I can't help but wonder if taking care of your own and hard work are values in the red states.
These people are innocent? They aren't innocent. They chose to vote that way. If the people who voted for Bush don't realize those ramifications, it isn't my job to explain it nicely. Frankly, I'm too busy staying out of debt, and they probably think I have too much foam on my nose from my latte to take me seriously anyway.
50% of the population voted for Kerry and live in a red state? Well, then they need to either move to a blue state, or talk to their friends and neighbors about why Bush had Bad Idea written all over him.
We aren't going to win unless we can win over those red states. And they don't want to hear it from me. It all has to come from the people they know, they people they respect.
Monday, September 27, 2004
The Tax Foundation has released a fascinating report showing which states benefit from federal tax and spending policies, and which states foot the bill.
The report shows that of the 32 states (and the District of Columbia) that are "winners" -- receiving more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes -- 76% are Red States that voted for George Bush in 2000. Indeed, 17 of the 20 (85%) states receiving the most federal spending per dollar of federal taxes paid are Red States. Here are the Top 10 states that feed at the federal trough (with Red States highlighted in bold):
States Receiving Most in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:
D.C. ($6.17)
North Dakota ($2.03)
New Mexico ($1.89)
Mississippi ($1.84)
Alaska ($1.82)
West Virginia ($1.74)
Montana ($1.64)
Alabama ($1.61)
South Dakota ($1.59)
Arkansas ($1.53)
In contrast, of the 16 states that are "losers" -- receiving less in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes -- 69% are Blue States that voted for Al Gore in 2000. Indeed, 11 of the 14 (79%) of the states receiving the least federal spending per dollar of federal taxes paid are Blue States. Here are the Top 10 states that supply feed for the federal trough (with Blue States highlighted in bold): States Receiving Least in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:
New Jersey ($0.62)
Connecticut ($0.64)
New Hampshire ($0.68)
Nevada ($0.73)
Illinois ($0.77)
Minnesota ($0.77)
Colorado ($0.79)
Massachusetts ($0.79)
California ($0.81)
New York ($0.81)
Two states -- Florida and Oregon (coincidentally, the two closest states in the 2000 Presidential election) -- received $1.00 in federal spending for each $1.00 in federal taxes paid. quotebox
I don't own any stocks or bonds. All my money is tied up in debt.
by muffilator on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 11:39:35 AM PDT
Exactly. I couldn't agree with you more. And I also accept your point that it was less than 50% of the people in the red states who voted against Bush and so clearly a majority are not innocent.
But what about the minority who passionately wanted to throw Bush out? So what if it was only 20% who voted against Bush in those states? Do they deserve to be pubished just because they live in red states? To me that smacks of collective punishement (though I admit that's a bit too strong of a term).
Don't get me wrong; I'm all for punishing the guilty ones. We've just got to do it in a way that targets the right people.
I actually had an idea about goading conservative Bible thumpers to sign onto a list of people who pledge that if they ever find themselves in any kind of medical crisis they will not accept any medical intervention that was made possible by the use of stem cell research.
It would be kind of like an organ donner card, and would be permanently attatched to their medical record (until, of course, they had second thoughts when confronted with the consequences of their "moral" stance.
Let's force them to put their own precious asses where their mouths are!
by Nate Roberts on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 02:50:55 PM PDT
The minority who passionately wanted to throw Bush out should talk to their friends and neighbors about why Bush's policies are bad for them, economically and morally. They need to make the sale for us - apparently we are doing something wrong when we speak to these people. If they can't convince people that it is time for a change, then why would they want to continue to live in a state that subsists on the dole, takes away rights and freedoms from several groups, and enacts bigoted laws?
This isn't about vengance. It is about taxation without representation. I send a large chunk of money to Washington, but I don't get to elect the president.
by muffilator on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 05:09:56 PM PDT
This speaks to a larger problem: What can we do with all of the people, living in these larger rural (red) states, whose economic future is decidedly bleak. The manufacturing jobs are disapearing, and I think it is a matter of time before we lose them permanently (unless some worlwide labor standards are changed pronto). There are only so many high-tech jobs to go around. I fear our service based economy will be unstable in the long term.
In the meantime, this population is getting older, prisons are filling, divorce rates skyrocketing.
I would love to see more tax breaks for companies like New Balance, who keep at least some manufacturing jobs here. We need to start producing regional goods again (even things like quilts and furniture). Organic, local farming. Invest in public works - keeping things green, building new areas. If we can become the best place to build an alternative fuel car, and keep that market hot through international environmental standards treaties, we could produce a big enough labor boom to prolong this for a while.
Ignorance can go both ways. I think if we remove the dependence on the federal system, the changes that we need economically can happen. The states are forced to be independent and survive on their own.
If we don't kick the kids out of the nest soon, before we know it they'll be 40 and living in the basement.
by muffilator on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 05:42:21 PM PDT
However, it would be nice if they starting seeing this in the red states. The REAL Republican agenda. Maybe the rest of the nation will wake up then.
McCain: Less jobs, more war.
by Unstable Isotope on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 05:38:52 PM PDT
Stephanie Dray of Jousting for Justice, a lefty blog with a Maryland tilt.
by stephdray on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 06:48:04 PM PDT
See all those white spots? Those are murdered children and suicidal adults. These, my kossak friends, is the fruits of religious extemism.
dont visit my blog!
by skallas on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 07:54:07 PM PDT
Censorship! Ban any TV, movie or books that do not conform with the Talibaptist Mullahs!
Establish State Religions! Give Scalia and Thomas their wish! The weirder and fundier, the better! I'd love to see a campaign in which the Talibaptists and the pentacostalists battle for supremacy, with Mormons serving as the Naderite spoiler!
Force fertile women to bear children! The more the merrier!
Criticize any request by these states for farm aid, subsidies as welfare and big government!
Make gun ownership and carrying mandatory!
by h0db on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 10:10:10 PM PDT
MeiLin Miranda in SL Your Progressive Homemaking Expert!
by LynnS on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 09:33:22 AM PDT
Okie? Join Sooner Kos. | Why Obama? Because we've never had a president whose name started with O.
by gypsy on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 11:45:55 PM PDT
and i live in red oklahoma. fuck'em. i have nothing but contempt for these hillbilly neanderthals at this point.
know whats weird? i hang out with a group of trial lawyers here and they are all bush people. WTF?
Any man can stand some adversity. If you really want to know a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln.
by maskling11 on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 03:04:52 PM PDT
Federal Flat Tax now.
by BartBoris on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 03:37:55 PM PDT
by Aguas de Marco on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 06:14:57 PM PDT
by stephdray on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 06:53:04 PM PDT
A federal law against first term abortions will be very difficult to uphold, as all rights "not enumerated in this constitution is retained be the states and the people".
It is time to bring back this time-honoured tradition: We never go to war because we want to, we only go to war because we have to.
by PoliticGeek Pro on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 07:26:05 AM PDT
Scalia in 5 words.
turtles consider every single vote deeply yet always vote dem
by TealVeal on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 11:32:45 AM PDT
But, according to Scalia, making decisions on moral questions, through the state legislature, is.
by PoliticGeek Pro on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 01:47:00 PM PDT
Charles from OKC
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful. And so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people. And neither do we." - W.
by ckerr on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 04:25:41 PM PDT
It's rather interesting that we can sometimes justify the suffering of innocent people to serve our own ends.
by GorgeousOrifice on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:52 PM PDT
My county was 77% bush and one of the top farm subsidy receiptant counties in the state of Texas.
by Jim Beard on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 08:49:52 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 613 comments