View Story | 94 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
Crawford, Aug. 6, 2001. U.S. president George W. Bush is on vacation. He wants to spend the whole month at his ranch in Texas. Every morning, however, he still receives his Presidential Daily Brief, or PDB, wherein the CIA informs the president about the country's security situation. On this morning, the report is straight from the CIA director. His PDB runs 11 and one-half printed pages, instead of the usual two to three, and carries the title, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S."
Take a look at the pdf itself. The page numbers at the bottom of the pages have been redacted.
The White House apparently has released only the first and last pages of an 11 1/2 page document. If 911 is becoming Watergate, then the 9-page gap is a weirdly creepy version of Rosemary Woods' "18 minute gap."
Someone should tell Dana Milbank and Walter Pincus.
Circumstances rule men; men do not rule circumstances. -The Histories of Herodotus, Book 7, Ch. 49
by Louise on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 10:42:36 AM PDT
Pick your favorite and write them. Sometimes they write back. Sometimes they ignore you. They read the stuff either way.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Groucho Marx
by DemFromCT on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 10:51:31 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
Now why would they redact page numbers? So no one asks for the rest of the document.
Seriously, call the cops on this one.
--- Read Dear Leader's Daily Thought
by grytpype on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 11:16:35 AM PDT
still unless the people who saw the original were quite limited, there would almost certainty that any kind of such omission would get exposed.
And waht is the source for hte statment in Die Zeit? And how have they covered this release? Do they raise questions about it? Give us some contemporary reportage.
do we still have a Republic and a Constitution if our elected officials will not stand up for them on our behalf?
by teacherken on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 11:30:35 AM PDT
After that, the length of the PDB itself seems to have never been questioned. According to a Walter Pincus article in the WaPo on May 24, 2002 (Under Bush, the Briefing Gets Briefer):
Under Bush, the PDB has become shorter, a seven-to-10-page document containing "more targeted hard intelligence" items, with few longer than a page, according to a former senior intelligence official who was involved in the process. It is written with the understanding that the president is a "multi-modality learner" who processes information better through questions and answers while reading along, the former official said.
The briefings had become "briefer" in comparison to Clinton's, who received 12-13 page docs with supporting documentation.
Does anyone here write conversational German, and can contact Oliver Schröm directly to ask him where his "11 1/2 page" figure came from? Perhaps he made a typo - or perhaps he's got information not available generally in the US.
by Louise on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 12:43:06 PM PDT
The former deputy attorney general, Jamie Gorelick, the only member of the 9/11 commission to read the president's daily brief, revealed in the hearings that the documents "would set your hair on fire" and that the intelligence warnings of al-Qaida attacks "plateaued at a spike level for months" before September 11. Bush is fighting public release of these PDBs, which would show whether he had marked them up and demanded action.
Pincus in the Washington Post, 2/12/04: Miscik also said there would be a review of the President's Daily Briefing, the bound book presented each morning to Bush with the most sensitive, latest overnight intelligence. Saying the PDB had been "dramatically revamped" in a way that "significantly improved the quality of the product" when Bush entered the White House, she said there would be a comparison with the material presented to President Bill Clinton "to see if some of the strong points of our earlier approach have been lost."
According to a senior intelligence official, the Bush version added "more sensitive operational information" and dropped some of the accompanying graphics that helped in understanding the substance of the material. In addition, the Bush PDB gets a more limited distribution within the agency, leaving some senior analysts unaware of what has been sent to the White House.
And from 2/11/04, 9/11 Panel to Accept Summary of Briefings Legal Challenge Scrapped; Agreement Angers Some Members, Victims' Families
Dan Eggen, Washington Post Staff Writer: The independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks backed away yesterday from a threatened legal showdown with the White House, agreeing to accept a 17-page summary of the presidential briefing documents it had sought.
The deal will not allow the full 10-member commission to read the original documents or to have access to notes on the documents taken by some of the commission's own members. The summary -- provided to commission members during a closed-door meeting yesterday -- covered several dozen original intelligence documents and was first vetted by the White House, officials said. [...] Under the original November agreement with the White House, four commission representatives -- Zelikow, Kean, Vice Chairman Lee H. Hamilton (D) and member Jamie S. Gorelick (D) -- had access to two dozen PDBs that the White House had preapproved as being relevant to the commission's mandate. In addition, Zelikow and Gorelick were able to comb through several hundred other PDBs from the Clinton and Bush administrations in search of information they deemed relevant.
From notes taken during these reviews, Gorelick compiled the 17-page summary provided to the commission yesterday, which was approved by the White House, officials said. Gorelick, a deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration, said the summary provides the commission with "the most important and salient facts" from the documents.
A-ha! I think what we're getting released is a summary and not all the intelligence in that day's PDB. 5/17/02, Dan Eggen and Dana Priest in the Washington Post:
The Aug. 6 briefing, according to officials with first-hand knowledge, was different. Along with current intelligence, it had a 1 1/2-page analysis -- largely speculative -- of what bin Laden might have been planning. The summary analysis was requested by Bush, according to White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.
on strike.
by daria g on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 01:29:35 PM PDT
How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis
by furryjester on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 12:00:26 PM PDT
Now, where they got this info, who knows.
by Bobo62 on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 12:07:38 PM PDT
by furryjester on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 12:45:11 PM PDT
Barack Obama will be President, John Edwards will send George W Bush to The Hague
by vanguardia on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 01:10:05 PM PDT
"Looking at the Aug 6 PDB with Adobe Reader 6.0, I noticed that the word, "an," before the second redaction appears to have been inserted into the document after the copy of the document was made. This word is conspicuously anti-aliased, whereas no other text in the PDB is--the rest of the text is highly pixelated."
by daria g on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 12:48:27 PM PDT
Is anyone capable of finding an email address for the article's author, Oliver Schröm, and asking him about the discrepency in page lengths?
Please?
Any musicians want to jam at Netroots Nation?
by snorfbat on Sun Apr 11, 2004 at 04:22:22 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 94 comments