Daily Kos

View Story | 17 comments

  •  I'm personally split on the issue (none / 1)

    While i'd LOVE to get rid of Lieberman in the Senate caucus, I know that for the 3 house races up in 2006 would all be helped tremendously with Liebermans far-and-ranging coattails. Perhaps with a Liberal Democrat instead of Lieberman, we may pick up max. 1 seat, rather than the 2 or 3 we should get.
    •  hmm (none / 0)

      Now that's an interesting argument that I haven't heard yet.  I still think replacing Lieberman with a real Democrat would be worth not picking up an extra 1-2 House seats.
    •  you know nothing of CT politics (none / 0)

      Shays,Simmons and Johnson will win going away if Joe is at the top of the Dem Ticket.Before you post any other tripe perhaps you should speak to Farrell,Courtney or Murphy if you even know who they are.

      http://dumpjoe.com/

      by ctkeith on Mon Dec 12, 2005 at 08:46:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Okay... (none / 0)

        I'm honestly sorry that I have not had the pleasure of meeting all 3 of these race's challengers. But also thank-you for offering me some fantastic analysis as to why he will not.

        Reagan's cottails took control of the Senate in 1980, Tommy Thompson's cottails nearly ousted Feingold in 1998, Gore's cottails most likely contributed to the ousting of the Republican senators in Washington, Michigan, Delaware, Minnesota, and Florida. Similarly, we're counting on Janet Napolitano's cottails to aid Pederson to his ousting of Kyl. Any conventional wisdom will tell you that a Dem. that expects to get ~70% of the vote will undeniably help you in nearly 50-50 districts as uneducated voters, voting for Lieberman, may cast their vote for the next D on the list - for Representative.

View Story | 17 comments