Daily Kos

View Story | 31 comments

  •  Googled Eberle McLean (none / 1)

    and I got this:

    The company doing the mailing

    Excerpt:

    McLEAN, Va.--Fundraiser Bruce Eberle, representing many of the animal protection charities with the highest ratios of fundraising to program expense of all those whose IRS Form 990 filings ANIMAL PEOPLE monitors, has apparently both gained and lost animal protection clients since ANIMAL PEOPLE last listed those known to be associated with him.

    Discontinuing a relationship with Eberle is the Dream Catcher Farm, Sanctuary, of Rocky Mount, Virginia. "We are no longer using any type of fundraising company," founder Catherine Sutphin wrote in an open letter to donors. "We tried using one for a couple of 'mail-outs,' but not all the money went to the sanctuary for the horses. We would net about 8%-10%... The company doing the 'mail-outs' gets most of the money for mailing list rentals, bank statements, designing, printing, [and] stuffing and mailing letters.

    SNIP

    The most recent IRS Form 990 filings of other known Eberle animal protection clients show fundraising plus administrative costs of up to 86% for Lifesavers Wild Horse Rescue; 69% for Tiger Haven; 54% for Tiger Creek; and an indeterminate total for Wildlife Waystation because the line on the Form 990 where fees paid to professional fundraisers are supposed to be declared was left blank. No current Form 990 is available for Great Cats In Crisis, Noah's Lost Ark, and other apparent Eberle clients.

    •  followed a link on Animal People, found this: (none / 0)

      Eberle Lawsuit Against Animal People

      Quite a few links on this site. Looks like they don't like this guy very much.

      •  Who is Bruce Eberle? (none / 1)

        Would you buy an appeal from Bruce Eberle?

        Excerpt:

        <b?Who is Eberle?</b>

        "The Eberle Communications Group began with the formation of Bruce W. Eberle & Associates in 1974," Eberle told ANIMAL PEOPLE by e-mail. "We have worked with nearly 200 national organizations," he said.

        Eberle clients have reportedly included former U.S. president Ronald Reagan; Oliver North, who was a central figure in the Iran/Contra scandal of the latter Reagan years in the White House; and former Los Angeles police officers Stacey Koon and Laurence Powell, who were sentenced to serve 30 months apiece in jail for allegedly committing the videotaped beating of motorist Rodney King in 1992. Their appeals said they were "political scapegoats of black radicals and self-serving liberal politicians."

        Eberle & Associates "works primarily with conservative groups," Eberle explained, while Fund Raising Strategies, formed later, "has worked with a wide variety of charitable organizations in wildlife welfare, historic preservation, veterans support, and poverty relief.

        "Both organizations," according to Eberle, "endeavor to operate under values" which include the claim that, "There is no substitute for integrity."

        "A few years back," Eberle admited, "we raised funds for a POW group. After a number of years we began to doubt their ability to fulfill their commitment to their donors. We terminated our relationship. That was several years before this same client engaged in activities that eventually came before a special committee of Congress. The truth," Eberle insists, "is that we were victimized by the political establishment," although Eberle also claims that Eberle & Associates helped to elect key members of the Republican majorities prevailing since 1990 in the U.S. Senate and since 1994 in the House of Representatives.

        "We accurately reported to the donors precisely what was related to us by the client," Eberle maintains. "Unfounded charges of fraud were made against us by self-serving politicians, but when the dust cleared and the matter had been reviewed by the Federal Trade Commission, we could hold our heads high. Some still quote out-of-context from that hearing, but the fact is that we did nothing wrong."

        Or at least nothing prosecutable: under court rulings which hold that the right of free speech prevails over accountability, nonprofit fundraisers enjoy much more leeway in what they can tell prospective donors than for-profit advertisers.

        "Using third party sources," Eberle insisted, "we endeavor to check our clients out and establish that they are indeed doing what they claim to do or have made concrete plans that will turn into reality with the availability of funds.

        Apparently he was involved in the Paula Jones thing too.

View Story | 31 comments