I'm just saying that it sounds as if it's identifying problems in people, as you said, and not problems in the scientific method itself.  As such, the questions still aren't condemnable, we just have all the more reason to be open and aware while asking and discussing them.

Anyway, I really do intend to track down the book.  My reading list is a bit of a deluge, but hopefully I can work it in.

Though PS - that "probably was before you were born"  remark is totally irrelevant and unnecessary.  Validity and truth of statements has nothing to do with who makes them (e.g. age, gender, whatever else).