First: It is Humor. You can see much much more sexual content by: turning on your television or opening a web browser. Monty python, Benny Hill.. FRIENDS used more sexual humor than this. And a certain group are allll atwitter....

Second: It's also a gay womans fantasy. How does he know! you ask. He knows because his best friend on earth is a gay woman.

Third: There are two definite segments of political women and of gay women who get very upset that women have any sort of sexuality at all. And both groups are much, much, much more sexist than the average bubba.

An explanation.  Women, as men, use social controls as a weapon against other women they consider more attractive. Again.. men do it to other men as well but its less pronounced. Wear a lowcut dress and you are both a whore and an affront to womens rights according to this group. Cut your hair off, perm it, wear body hiding clothes and pretend at a distaste for sex, or at least sex with men and you are a heroine for the cause. If you doubt this in the slightest or think it is because of a built in cultural gender belief
there have been several studies that examined these phenomena. To make the point clearer lets switch the roles. A man goes into a bar. He has very long flowing hair, wears tight black leather pants that show off his body, a white linen shirt unbuttoned down the front. And moves his hips in a very sexual way (intentionally). He faces open, rabid hostility from every other man in the bar.
This isnt a hypothetical. In college i remember this specific study and its' being repeated. The males in the bar were threatened by the open sexuality of the man who was in effect... advertising to the women for sex and very effectively. Now reverse the sex's.  A group of people going to dinner. One of the women, who happens to be unusually attractive and well built, wears a very low cut revealing dress. And moves in what can only be described as tempting or erotic. she will face instant open hostility from the other women who view her as a sexual threat.

This is exactly what i believe we are seeing here from one group. It isnt about "womens rights! Abortion! Degrading women!!".. it is about sexual and personal insecurity from a particular group. The group who applies social pressure to make women do the "you're middle age now!" thing. Ie get a perm, wear pants suits, hide your body, be very nonsexual..

The other group i believe are quite simply controlling and sexist in exactly the same way the very worst of male chauvinists are. IE Women must hate sex. Women must be nonsexual. Women must never express a desire to appeal sexually to others (of either sex). Women must attempt to follow the male socialpath. etc etc etc.

Third and finally: Hypocrasy. The rank sort. IE a woman who wears a lowcut top, short skirt, tight jeans is a whore. Whereas a woman who exposes her breast in a restaurant to breast feed is a "hero of the revolution". Its ridiculous, hypocritical and vile. Human beings are human beings. Both women and men are sexual beings. If this commercial had been of two young well built shirtless males doing EXACTLY the same thing the very people attacking it would have been praising it for its "support of women and homosexual males!". It would have been a cause celebre.....