Daily Kos

View Story | 24 comments

  •  And so... (none / 0)

    People living in poverty, people dying in war, the collapsing environment, declining living standards, declining civil rights, and everything else takes a back seat so that an organization can help the Republicans maintain a majority in the hope that maybe this guy will vote for choice if Fritz lets him.

    I'm starting to understand why the prochoice movement is so exclusively upper middle class.

    •  In democracy only some people can have rights? (none / 0)

      I missed the part in the Constitution what said "We the poor people ... " I thought everybody got them.

      Which rights have you given up for [insert your cause here]?

      And where do you get these assumptions about how much I make/don't, what my background is, whatever you use in your little formula of who should have civil rights?

      •  Maybe I'm missing something here (none / 0)

        You're saying you have fewer rights than poor people?  I mean, I've met Libertarians and Republicans who believe that.  Never a leftist.  A first time for everything I guess.

        Makes sense since you're resorting to a Freeper tactic here attempting to paint me as anti-choice.  Reminds me of being painted as anti-American for opposition to the war.

        When did I say anything about your background?  Can you quote me verbatim?  I believe I was referring to the indisputable fact that lower income people (and many, many people of color btw) are alienated from the pro-choice organizations, and I think that the willingness to sell them out to support a cheap pol who's voted for them on occassion, but just voted to confirm a judge who's extremely bad news to all of their causes - well, I think that may have something to do with it.

View Story | 24 comments