View Story | 98 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
by stefanie76 on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 05:24:25 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
I don't care about the institutional movement that has failed to stem the erosion of privacy/health rights for women. NARAL and Co have failed. Liza seems to understands that. Lots of people do not. You, apparently, being one of them.
Yet the status quo ain't doing anyone but the Right Wing any favors.
I care about the end result, not about whose feelings get hurt because I criticized the wrong person.
by kos on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 05:50:34 PM PDT
I wouldn't exactly call this the status quo since we are now moving away from choice.
Your ends justify the means strategy is going to lose. You know a lot about losing though, right Kos? What are you, 0-16 now?
by stefanie76 on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 05:57:43 PM PDT
Because unless we lefties start swallowing out pride and working together to form a united front, we can count on the republicans coasting from victory to victory on momentum alone.
by The oopla on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 06:18:52 PM PDT
Personally, I think they should have been trying to take it off the table - taken the discussion to "it is legal so get over it", but they want it on the table and they have managed the messaging poorly enough to lose support.
by inclusiveheart on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 06:54:03 PM PDT
More and Better Democrats: Help Build An Obamajority.
by Adam B on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 06:59:10 PM PDT
Answer me this riddler... why were Reagan's anti-choice positions not a politically "viable" if it was at 52% in the 80's and now everything is possible? Things have changed dramatically.
by inclusiveheart on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 07:08:16 PM PDT
They just didn't have the votes on the Supreme Court yet to do anything about it. That's why Webster and Casey, ex ante, were so scary.
by Adam B on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 07:11:35 PM PDT
Nowadays, his extremist positions are the GOP plank.
its hard to drink all day unless you start in the morning
by The Exalted on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 07:38:52 PM PDT
Friends, this is radical feminism. The agenda Clinton & Clinton would impose on America--abortion on demand, a litmus test for the Supreme Court, homosexual rights, discrimination against religious schools, women in combat--that's change, all right. But it is not the kind of change America wants. It is not the kind of change America needs. And it is not the kind of change we can tolerate in a nation that we still call God's country. . . . My friends, this election is about much more than who gets what. It is about who we are. It is about what we believe. It is about what we stand for as Americans. There is a religious war going on in our country for the soul of America. It is a cultural war, as critical to the kind of nation we will one day be as was the Cold War itself. And in that struggle for the soul of America, Clinton & Clinton are on the other side, and George Bush is on our side. And so, we have to come home, and stand beside him.
My friends, this election is about much more than who gets what. It is about who we are. It is about what we believe. It is about what we stand for as Americans. There is a religious war going on in our country for the soul of America. It is a cultural war, as critical to the kind of nation we will one day be as was the Cold War itself. And in that struggle for the soul of America, Clinton & Clinton are on the other side, and George Bush is on our side. And so, we have to come home, and stand beside him.
And arguably, that speech didn't even hurt GHWB.
by Adam B on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 07:51:00 PM PDT
Blogging the revolution @culturekitchen.com & The Daily Gotham
by liza on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 09:43:26 PM PDT
by The Exalted on Thu Aug 25, 2005 at 07:18:48 AM PDT
First of all, it's 2-16. And it'll probably be 4-30 by the time the next election is over. That's what happens when you work to spread the playing field by fielding more candidates and challenging incumbent Republicans and open red districts.
And it's what happens when you think long-term and work to build up parties in districts and states that have no Democratic parties. You see, it's call working on the big picture.
But you can applaud NARAL for endorsing Chafee, and you can applaud Chafee for voting to confirm Janice Brown and other anti-choice judges when our anti-abortion Democrats voted against those judges. And after you're done applauding Chafee for being "pro-choice", and ragging on "anti-abortion" Democrats, you can consider why we're losing so badly on the issue.
Aside from the assault on choice by the governing Republicans, abortion is the one issue in which teens are more conservative than adults. Kinds that are strongly for gay marriages and other progressive causes are trending away from Choice. Not a good long-term development.
by kos on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 08:44:52 PM PDT
They should have fucking used that money to build the infrastructure for a PRO-CHOICE NEW MEDIA NETWORK; so the "Catholic News" and the "LifeNews" of the internet don't go around spewing their hateful lies about abortion.
You don't get it.
by liza on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 09:29:05 PM PDT
where women's words are valued and respected, Our Word
by artemisia on Thu Aug 25, 2005 at 01:41:21 PM PDT
by liza on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 09:45:14 PM PDT
by liza on Wed Aug 24, 2005 at 09:24:06 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 98 comments